Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-En-Y gastric bypass: mid-term results from the United Arab Emirates

被引:0
|
作者
Alshamsi, Asma [1 ]
Barajas-Gamboa, Juan S. [1 ]
Piechowska-Jozwiak, Maja I. [1 ]
Restrepo-Rodas, Gabriela [1 ]
Abril, Carlos [1 ,3 ]
Raza, Javed [1 ]
Pantoja, Juan Pablo [1 ]
Guerron, Alfredo D. [1 ]
Corcelles, Ricard [2 ,3 ]
Kroh, Matthew [2 ,3 ]
Rodriguez, John [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Abu Dhabi, Dept Gen Surg, Digest Dis Inst, POB 112412, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] Cleveland Clin, Digest Dis & Surg Inst, Dept Gen Surg, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2025年 / 39卷 / 01期
关键词
Bariatric surgery; Weight loss; Conversions; One anastomosis gastric bypass; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11271-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundOne-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is becoming popular, but some patients may need to convert to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) due weight-related difficulties or postoperative complications. The data on conversions is currently limited to 30-day or short-term follow-up studies. As such, the objective of this study was to evaluate the indications and mid-term outcomes for OAGB conversions to RYGB at a tertiary referral center in the United Arab Emirates.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent conversion from OAGB to RYGB between February 2016 and May 2023. Demographic information, indications for conversion, intraoperative details, and mid-term outcomes were collected and analyzed.ResultsSixty-four patients underwent conversion from previous OAGB to RYGB. The cohort was 73.4% female (n = 47) with a mean age of 40.8 years. Indications for conversion included acid reflux (n = 28, 43.7%), intractable nausea/vomiting (n = 20, 31.2%), protein-calorie malnutrition (n = 7, 10.9%), anastomotic ulcer (n = 6, 9.3%) and weight recidivism (n = 3, 4.7%). The mean operative time was 238 +/- 78.3 min. During the procedure, three intraoperative complications occurred: two cases of bleeding and one case of bowel perforation; all successfully addressed during surgery. The median hospital stay was 3 +/- 15.8 days. Three patients (4.6%) experienced major postoperative complications comprising 2 anastomotic leaks and 1 small bowel obstruction. The mean follow-up time was 26.2 +/- 19.7 months, with 96.2% of patients reporting resolution of symptoms. There were no mortalities.ConclusionsAcid reflux is representing 43.7% of the indications for conversion from OAGB to RYGB. The symptom resolution rate holds significance, standing at a remarkable 96.8%. Despite surgical technique advancements, the complication rate after conversions remains significant at 4.6%, with no mortality reported. OAGB patients should be informed about these risks prior to undergoing conversions from OAGB to RYGB.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 424
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Restrictive Index Surgery-a Metaanalysis and Comparison with Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
    Yeo, Charleen
    Ho, Glen
    Syn, Nicholas
    Mak, Malcolm
    Ahmed, Saleem
    Oo, Aung Myint
    Koura, Aaryan
    Kaushal, Sanghvi
    Yeo, Danson
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (03) : 949 - 964
  • [22] One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass–Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)—a Mid-Term Cohort Study with 612 Patients
    Karl P. Rheinwalt
    Andreas Plamper
    Marcia V. Rückbeil
    Andreas Kroh
    Ulf P. Neumann
    Tom F. Ulmer
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 1230 - 1240
  • [23] Results of The Comparative Study of 200 Cases: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
    Salvador Navarrete
    José Luis Leyba
    Salvador Navarrete Ll
    Guillermo Borjas
    José León Tapia
    Ruben Alcázar
    Obesity Surgery, 2018, 28 : 2597 - 2602
  • [24] Results of The Comparative Study of 200 Cases: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
    Navarrete, Salvador
    Leyba, Jose Luis
    Navarrete Li, Salvador
    Borjas, Guillermo
    Leon Tapia, Jose
    Alcazar, Ruben
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (09) : 2597 - 2602
  • [25] One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Prospective Trial
    Karagul, Servet
    Senol, Serdar
    Karakose, Oktay
    Uzunoglu, Kevser
    Kayaalp, Cuneyt
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (02):
  • [26] The Comparison of the Clinical and Metabolic Results of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Morbid Obese Patients
    Goksoy, Beslen
    Dogan, Selim
    Aksakal, Nihat
    Calikoglu, Bedia Fulya
    Bilgic, Tayfun
    Barbaros, Umut
    BARIATRIC SURGICAL PRACTICE AND PATIENT CARE, 2021, 16 (04) : 252 - 258
  • [27] Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Study
    Salman, Mohamed AbdAlla
    Abelsalam, Ahmed
    Nashed, George Abdelfady
    Yacoub, Mohamed
    Abdalla, Ahmed
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (07) : 1966 - 1973
  • [28] Metabolic comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass, single-anastomosis duodenal-switch, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and vertical sleeve gastrectomy in rate
    Arble, Deanna M.
    Evers, Simon S.
    Bozadjieva, Nadejda
    Frikke-Schmidt, Henriette
    Myronovych, Andriy
    Lewis, Alfor
    Toure, Mouhamadoul Habib
    Seeley, Randy J.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (12) : 1857 - 1867
  • [29] Long biliopancreatic one-anastomosis gastric bypass vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in super obese: is there a difference?
    Eskandaros, Moheb
    Abbass, Alaa
    Darwish, Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 41 (01): : 296 - 304
  • [30] One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Long Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
    Ibrahim, Mohamed Y.
    Elshennawy, Abdelmoneim S.
    Wassef, Arsany Talaat Saber
    Salah, Ayman
    Hassan, Ahmed M.
    Mikhail, Sameh
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (03) : 779 - 785