Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study

被引:2
作者
West, Madeline L. [1 ]
Rathbone, Joanne A. [2 ]
Bilal, Maria [3 ]
Fernando, Anne Nileshni [1 ]
Sharp, Gemma [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Neurosci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Med & Psychol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Campbelltown Hosp, Macarthur Diabet Endocrinol & Metab Serv, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
weight bias; weight stigma; obesity; primary care; education; BIAS; PROFESSIONALS; OBESITY; STIGMA; PEOPLE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-024-09202-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundWeight bias is characterised by negative attitudes towards people with a higher weight and is widespread in healthcare. Primary care professionals sometimes avoid discussing weight with patients due to concerns about upsetting them, insufficient training, resources, or referral pathways. There is, however, a responsibility for primary care professionals to address the health needs of patients, which may require discussing weight.ObjectiveThe current study aimed to understand primary care professionals and trainee perceptions of the appropriateness of weight-centric, weight-inclusive/holistic, and avoidant approaches for discussing weight with higher weight individuals when patients were and were not seeking weight management advice.DesignMixed methods design.ParticipantsPrimary care professionals and trainees (N = 112) within Australia.ApproachParticipants first completed an online survey and provided demographic data and completed measures of implicit and explicit weight bias. Secondly, participants viewed simulated patient consultations, reflecting each of the three approaches (weight-centric, weight-inclusive/holistic, and avoidant) in a weight-related and non-weight related context. Participants then evaluated the appropriateness of the language and strategies used.Key resultsThe participants showed, on average, low to moderate levels of explicit weight bias but high levels of implicit weight bias. For the consultations, language and strategies of the holistic approach were considered the most appropriate in both contexts. In the weight-related consultation, language used in the weight-centric and avoidant approaches were deemed equally inappropriate. However, weight-centric strategies were considered more appropriate than avoidant strategies. In the non-weight related consultation, the language and strategies of the avoidant approach were considered more appropriate than those of the weight-centric approach.ConclusionsPrimary care professionals and trainees favoured the holistic approach to discussing weight when patients presented with weight-related or non-weight related concerns. These findings have potential practical implications for health professional education.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 317
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Weight bias reduction in health professionals: a systematic review
    Alberga, A. S.
    Pickering, B. J.
    Hayden, K. Alix
    Ball, G. D. C.
    Edwards, A.
    Jelinski, S.
    Nutter, S.
    Oddie, S.
    Sharma, A. M.
    Russell-Mayhew, S.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBESITY, 2016, 6 (03) : 175 - 188
  • [2] Albury C, 2020, LANCET DIABETES ENDO, V8, P447, DOI 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30102-9
  • [3] [Anonymous], Obesity: Identification, Assessment and Management 2014 (Updated 2022)
  • [4] Association for Size Diversity and Health, COMMITTED SIZE INCLU
  • [5] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, PRIMARY HLTH CARE AU
  • [6] Raising the topic of weight in general practice: perspectives of GPs and primary care nurses
    Blackburn, Maxine
    Stathi, Afroditi
    Keogh, Edmund
    Eccleston, Christopher
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (08):
  • [7] Canadian dietitians' approaches to counseling adult clients seeking weight-management advice
    Chapman, GE
    Sellaeg, K
    Levy-Milne, R
    Ottem, A
    Barr, SI
    Fierini, D
    Marchessault, G
    Nolan, D
    Paquette, MC
    Saunders, N
    Thiele, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2005, 105 (08) : 1275 - 1279
  • [8] Clarke V., Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, V3, P222, DOI [10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4103]
  • [9] A POWER PRIMER
    COHEN, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [10] Cohen J., 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences