Pluralism and the Design of Autonomous Vehicles

被引:0
作者
Adam Henschke [1 ]
Chirag Arora [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Twente, Philosophy Section
[2] Ethics,undefined
[3] Philosophy and Technology Section,undefined
关键词
Autonomous vehicles; Pluralism; Values; Design; Ethics; Epistemic pluralism;
D O I
10.1007/s13347-024-00802-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper advocates for an ethical analysis of autonomous vehicle systems (AVSs) based on a moral epistemic pluralism. This paper contends that approaching the design of intricate social technologies, such as AVSs, is most effective when acknowledging a diverse range of values. Additionally, a comprehensive ethical framework for autonomous vehicles should be applied across two interconnected layers. The first layer centers on the individual level, where each autonomous vehicle becomes a unit of moral consideration. The second layer focuses on the system level, directing moral attention toward the intricate autonomous vehicle system as a whole. Distinguishing the approach from metaphysical pluralism, the paper responds to counterarguments from a moral relativist and value monist perspectives. It concludes by emphasizing the necessity of embracing epistemic pluralism to navigate the complex ethical landscape of AVSs, urging a holistic understanding that transcends individual events and integrates system-level considerations.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Aikin SF(2016)Pragmatism and Pluralism Revisited Political Studies Review 14 17-26
  • [2] Talisse RB(2016)The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles Science 352 1573-1576
  • [3] Bonnefon J-F(2017)Self-driving cars and engineering ethics: The need for a system level analysis Science and Engineering Ethics, November. 34 1475-1499
  • [4] Shariff A(2021)Autonomous driving and public reason: A Rawlsian approach Philosophy and Technology 200 106929-757
  • [5] Rahwan I(2020)Classification scheme for root cause and failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) of passenger vehicle recalls Reliability Engineering and System Safety 30 748-418
  • [6] Borenstein J(2016)Responsibility and the moral phenomenology of using self-driving cars Applied Artificial Intelligence 25 399-433
  • [7] Herkert JR(2019)Human decisions in moral dilemmas are largely described by utilitarianism: Virtual car driving study provides guidelines for autonomous driving vehicles Science and Engineering Ethics 4 411-1408
  • [8] Miller KW(1975)Reason and maximization Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 1383-92
  • [9] Brändle C(2021)Self-driving vehicles—an ethical overview Philosophy & Technology 22 81-630
  • [10] Schmidt MW(2020)Trust and resilient autonomous driving systems Ethics and Information Technology 21 619-544