Lights and shadows of nature-based solutions in the Anthropocene: Perspectives from indigenous narratives in Latin America

被引:0
作者
Carabajal, Maria Ines [1 ]
Quispe, Fany Beatriz Ramos [2 ,3 ]
Nina, Sergio Romero [4 ,5 ]
Chico, Hector Turra [6 ]
Jimenez, Ana Watson [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Natl Sci & Tech Res Council CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Belmont Forum, La Paz, Bolivia
[3] Ctr Acc Desarrollo Educ & Cultura CADEC, La Paz, Bolivia
[4] Municipio Llallagua Norte Potosi, La Paz, Bolivia
[5] Ctr Acc Desarrollom Educ & Cultura CADEC, Madre Tierra & Medio Amiente Programme, La Paz, Bolivia
[6] Univ Catolica Temuco, Fac Educ, Temuco, Chile
[7] Univ Calgary, Biomed Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
Anthropocene; Nature based Solutions; Indigenous-based narratives; Pluralism; SDG; Latin America & the Caribbean; CLIMATE; KNOWLEDGE; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11027-024-10189-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The profound transformation of the Earth and its ecosystems within the Anthropocene, have opened up a discussion about how to imagine, plan and implement climate action. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are frequently approached as the human actions aimed at protecting, managing, and restoring ecosystems with the dual objective of enhancing environmental conservation and addressing societal challenges such as sustainable development. In this work, we offer a critical analysis of the narratives from which NbS result from. We contextualize the NbS narrative as emergent from the Anthropocene frameworks and use the lenses of alternative worldviews from Latin America and the Caribbean, which hold other ways of knowing historically neglected by Modern ontologies and epistemologies. As most of the research on NbS has been produced in the Global North, we, a group of Latin American early-career scholars and an Indigenous activist, argue that hegemonic narratives on nature -driven current decision making in global environmental change policies- perversely reinforces exclusionary environmental practices at national and local scales. Such narratives are based on human-centered, Eurocentric and hegemonic scientific worldviews. Drawing on qualitative research that included a critical discourse analysis of existing literature, Indigenous Peoples declarations, and interviews, we examine how NbS is defined within the framework of the Anthropocene and in some cases in contradiction with local Indigenous-based narratives and realities. In this paper, we unpack the need to seek and develop local and pluralistic narratives of climate solutions beyond NbS frameworks in Latin America.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 115 条
  • [1] Allen Myles., 2018, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157940
  • [2] Mobilizing transdisciplinary collaborations: collective reflections on decentering academia in knowledge production
    Alonso-Yanez, Gabriela
    House-Peters, Lily
    Garcia-Cartagena, Martin
    Bonelli, Sebastian
    Lorenzo-Arana, Ignacio
    Ohira, Marcella
    [J]. GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, Indigenous Latin American in the Twenty-First Century: The First Decade
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions, VFirst
  • [5] Asafu-Adjaye J, 2015, An Ecomodersnist Manifesto
  • [6] Bacca PI., 2019, Maguar (Bogota, Colombia), V33, P139, DOI [10.15446/mag.v33n2.86199, DOI 10.15446/MAG.V33N2.86199]
  • [7] Participatory urban planning for climate change adaptation in coastal cities: lessons from a pilot experience in Maputo, Mozambique
    Broto, Vanesa Castan
    Boyd, Emily
    Ensor, Jonathan
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 13 : 11 - 18
  • [8] Bugre A, 2023, Manifiesto del Vivir Bien
  • [9] Nuestro Mundo es Posible
  • [10] Bulkeley H., 2020, Nature-based solutions-state of the art in EU-funded projects, DOI [10.2777/236007, DOI 10.2777/236007]