Quantum resources of quantum and classical variational methods

被引:0
|
作者
Spriggs, Thomas [1 ]
Ahmadi, Arash [1 ]
Chen, Bokai [2 ]
Greplova, Eliska [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, QuTech & Kavli Inst Nanosci, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Kavli Inst Nanosci, Delft, Netherlands
来源
MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2025年 / 6卷 / 01期
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
quantum information; neural networks; variational methods; quantum circuits; tensor networks; neural quantum states; MANY-BODY PROBLEM; FERROMAGNETISM;
D O I
10.1088/2632-2153/adaca2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Variational techniques have long been at the heart of atomic, solid-state, and many-body physics. They have recently extended to quantum and classical machine learning, providing a basis for representing quantum states via neural networks. These methods generally aim to minimize the energy of a given ansatz, though open questions remain about the expressivity of quantum and classical variational ans & auml;tze. The connection between variational techniques and quantum computing, through variational quantum algorithms, offers opportunities to explore the quantum complexity of classical methods. We demonstrate how the concept of non-stabilizerness, or magic, can create a bridge between quantum information and variational techniques and we show that energy accuracy is a necessary but not always sufficient condition for accuracy in non-stabilizerness. Through systematic benchmarking of neural network quantum states, matrix product states, and variational quantum methods, we show that while classical techniques are more accurate in non-stabilizerness, not accounting for the symmetries of the system can have a severe impact on this accuracy. Our findings form a basis for a universal expressivity characterization of both quantum and classical variational methods.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance comparison between classical and quantum control for a simple quantum system
    Xi, Zairong
    Jin, Guangsheng
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2008, 387 (04) : 1056 - 1062
  • [32] Quantum system decomposition for the semi-classical quantum Fourier transform
    Greco, Ben
    Lenahan, Jack
    Huerth, Suzanne
    Medlock, Jan
    Overbey, Lucas A.
    QUANTUM INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION X, 2012, 8400
  • [33] Multi-Party Quantum Key Distribution Using Variational Quantum Eigensolvers
    Sihare, Shyam R.
    ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [34] Matchgates and classical simulation of quantum circuits
    Jozsa, Richard
    Miyake, Akimasa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2008, 464 (2100): : 3089 - 3106
  • [35] Cavity magnomechanics: from classical to quantum
    Zuo, Xuan
    Fan, Zhi-Yuan
    Qian, Hang
    Ding, Ming-Song
    Tan, Huatang
    Xiong, Hao
    Li, Jie
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2024, 26 (03):
  • [36] Classical benchmarking for microwave quantum illumination
    Karsa, Athena
    Pirandola, Stefano
    IET QUANTUM COMMUNICATION, 2021, 2 (04): : 246 - 257
  • [37] Artificial Intelligence in Classical and Quantum Photonics
    Vernuccio, Federico
    Bresci, Arianna
    Cimini, Valeria
    Giuseppi, Alessandro
    Cerullo, Giulio
    Polli, Dario
    Valensise, Carlo Michele
    LASER & PHOTONICS REVIEWS, 2022, 16 (05)
  • [38] The ambiguity of simplicity in quantum and classical simulation
    Aghamohammadi, Cina
    Mahoney, John R.
    Crutchfield, James P.
    PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2017, 381 (14) : 1223 - 1227
  • [39] A Quantum State of Classical and Nonclassical Natures
    Othman, Anas
    OPTICS, PHOTONICS AND LASERS (OPAL 2019), 2019, : 39 - 41
  • [40] Calibrating the role of entanglement in variational quantum circuits
    Nakhl, Azar C.
    Quella, Thomas
    Usman, Muhammad
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2024, 109 (03)