Invasive devices to monitor the intraspinal perfusion pressure in the hemodynamic management of acute spinal cord injury: A systematic scoping review

Background Various methods for measuring intrathecal pressure (ITP) after spinal cord injury (SCI) to guide hemodynamic management have been investigated. To synthesize the current literature, this current study conducted a scoping review of the use of intrathecal devices to monitor ITP during acute management of SCI with the aim of understanding the association between ITP monitoring with physiological and clinical outcomes. Methods A systematic review of literature following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. All eligible studies were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extracted included number of patients included, severity of injury, characteristics of the intervention-intrathecal device used to record the ITP, outcomes -hemodynamic parameters observed, changes in the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS), total motor scores, association of ITP with other physiological variables. Results The search yielded a total of 1,698 articles, of which 30 observational studies and 2 randomized clinical trials were deemed eligible based on their use of an intrathecal invasive device to monitor spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) in patients with SCI. Of these, 9 studies used a lumbar drain, 23 a Codman pressure probe and 1 study that used both. These studies underscore the crucial interplay between ITP, the SCPP and physiological variables, with neurological outcome. It is still unclear whether monitoring from a lumbar drain is accurate enough to highlight what is occurring at the site of SCI, which is the main advantage of Codman Probe, however, the latter requires specialized personnel that may not be available in most settings. Minor adverse effects were associated with lumbar drain catheters, while cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring repair (similar to 7%) is the main concern with Codman Probes. Conclusion Future investigation of SCPP protocols via lumbar drains and Codman probes ought to involve multi-centered randomized controlled trials and continued translational investigation with animal models.