Development and validation of a prediction model for delayed recovery from anesthesia in elderly lung adenocarcinoma patients underwent thoracoscopic radical resection

被引:0
作者
Li, Qiang [1 ]
Xia, Fuhai [1 ]
He, Xiaoshuang [1 ]
Yan, Qing [1 ]
Wu, Qiuling [1 ]
Liu, Chang [2 ]
Chen, Rui [1 ]
Li, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Cent Hosp Wuhan, Tongji Med Coll, Operating Room, Wuhan 430014, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Cent Hosp Wuhan, Tongji Med Coll, Anesthesiol Dept, Wuhan 430014, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Delayed recovery; Anesthesia; Lung adenocarcinoma; Video-assisted thoracoscopic; Prediction model;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-79648-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model based on real-world data to assess the risk of delayed recovery from anesthesia in elderly lung adenocarcinoma patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) radical resection. This study is a retrospective study of real-world data. A total of 257 elderly lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent VATS radical resection from January 2022 to December 2023 in a tertiary hospital in Wuhan were selected. Patients were divided into delayed recovery (n = 42) and non-delayed recovery group (n = 215) according to whether delayed recovery occurred after anesthesia. Lasso regression was used to screen the independent variables. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of delayed recovery from anesthesia, and a nomogram model was established. Bootstrap method was used to internally verify the nomogram model. Delayed recovery from anesthesia occurred in 42 of 257 elderly lung adenocarcinoma patients underwent VATS radical resection (16.34%). Logistic regression analysis showed that anesthesia duration, intraoperative infusion volume, inhaled desflurane, preoperative respiratory tract infection, intraoperative hypothermia and diagnosed with hypertension were risk factors for delayed recovery from anesthesia in elderly lung adenocarcinoma patients underwent VATS radical resection (P < 0.05). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.869, 95% CI (0.815 similar to 0.923). The optimal cutoff value was 0.198, the sensitivity was 0.738, and the specificity was 0.823. Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that chi(2) = 7.346, P = 0.500. The decision curve analysis results have shown that the threshold probability is between 0.23 and 0.91, and the net benefit rate of the model is good. The risk prediction model constructed in this study can provide reference for medical staff to screen precisely high-risk of delayed recovery from anesthesia in elderly lung adenocarcinoma patients underwent VATS radical resection, which is of great significance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Risk factors of inadequate emergence following general anesthesia with an emphasis on patients with substance dependence history
    Makarem, Jalil
    Larijani, Amir Hossein
    Eslami, Babak
    Jafarzadeh, Afshin
    Karvandian, Kasra
    Mireskandari, Seyed Mohammad
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 73 (04) : 302 - 310
  • [22] A nomogram to predict hyperkalemia in patients with hemodialysis: a retrospective cohort study
    Mei, Ziwei
    Chen, Jun
    Chen, Peipei
    Luo, Songmei
    Jin, Lie
    Zhou, Limei
    [J]. BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [23] Misal Ullhas Sudhakarrao, 2016, Anesth Essays Res, V10, P164, DOI 10.4103/0259-1162.165506
  • [24] National Center for Quality Assurance of Anesthesia, 2023, Med. J. Peking Union Med. College Hospital, V14, P734, DOI [10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0266(inChinese), DOI 10.12290/XHYXZZ.2023-0266(INCHINESE)]
  • [25] Inhaled anaesthesia compared with conventional sedation in post cardiac arrest patients undergoing temperature control: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parlow, Simon
    Lepage-Ratte, Melissa Fay
    Jung, Richard G.
    Fernando, Shannon M.
    Visintini, Sarah
    Sterling, Lee H.
    Di Santo, Pietro
    Simard, Trevor
    Russo, Juan J.
    Labinaz, Marino
    Hibbert, Benjamin
    Nolan, Jerry P.
    Rochwerg, Bram
    Mathew, Rebecca
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2022, 176 : 74 - 79
  • [26] Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model
    Riley, Richard D.
    Ensor, Joie
    Snell, Kym I. E.
    Harrell, Frank E., Jr.
    Martin, Glen P.
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Collins, Gary
    van Smeden, Maarten
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368
  • [27] Sagiroglu G, 2020, JCPSP-J COLL PHYSICI, V30, P123, DOI 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.02.123
  • [28] Shen J., 2023, J. Bengbu Med. College, V48, P766, DOI [10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.06.013, DOI 10.13898/J.CNKI.ISSN.1000-2200.2023.06.013]
  • [29] Shen XY., 2019, Guangdong Med. J, V40, P3021, DOI [10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20190548(inChinese), DOI 10.13820/J.CNKI.GDYX.20190548(INCHINESE)]
  • [30] Medico-economic impact of thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy in lung cancer: multicentre randomised controlled trial (Lungsco01)
    Soilly, Anne-Laure
    Aho Glele, Ludwig Serge
    Bernard, Alain
    Abou Hanna, Halim
    Filaire, Marc
    Magdaleinat, Pierre
    Marty-Ane, Charles
    Tronc, Francois
    Grima, Renaud
    Baste, Jean-Marc
    Thomas, Pascal-Alexandre
    Richard De Latour, Bertrand
    Pforr, Arnaud
    Pages, Pierre-Benoit
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)