Techno-Economic Analysis of Biodiesel Production from Chlorella vulgaris Using Different Potential Biorefinery Approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Sudhanthiran, M. C. [1 ]
Pandian, P. Muttu [1 ]
Mathew, Febin [1 ]
Perumalsamy, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Bioseparat Engn Lab, Tiruchirappalli 620015, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Microalgae; In situ transesterification; Solvent extraction; Heat integration; Optimization; OIL EXTRACTION; MICROALGAE; TRANSESTERIFICATION; INVESTMENT; PRICE;
D O I
10.1007/s12155-025-10823-1
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Biodiesel from microalgae offers a renewable alternative to fossil fuels, with carbon dioxide utilization and capturing lipids without competing with food resources. The extraction, drying, and transesterification processes play a crucial role in converting raw biomass into high-quality biofuel. In this article, Chlorella vulgaris was grown in optimized conditions to improve the lipid content, and biodiesel was synthesized. Lipid content was evaluated from microalgal biomass, and the obtained data were given as input to two different production pathways, viz. solvent extraction and in situ transesterification. When utilizing the extraction and drying processes in the former method, it was discovered that they are the major cost contributors, which were eliminated in the latter through in situ transesterification. Optimization of various operating variables, such as methanol-oil molar ratio, reaction time, reaction temperature, number of stages, feed stage for distillation columns, and water and hexane flow rate for recovery of FAME, was studied in the simulation process. The solvent extraction method achieved 92% oil conversion, with 98% methanol recovery and 96% ester recovery after distillation. The in situ transesterification process achieved 92% oil-to-FAME conversion, with a payback period of 1.72 years for the non-heat integrated process and 1.88 years for the heat-integrated process. Capital costs were $3.48 million (non-heat integrated) and $4.51 million (heat integrated) compared to solvent extraction at $5.05 million (non-heat integrated) and $6.49 million (heat integrated), demonstrating superior economic efficiency. A techno-economic analysis reveals that in situ transesterification has the lowest capital cost and payback period but higher operating costs due to methanol usage; however, with process intensification and optimized configurations, it could become a commercially viable approach for biodiesel production. Regulatory frameworks and infrastructure investment support scalability, while eliminating costly steps like drying enhances economic and environmental sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biodiesel production in crude oil contaminated environment using Chlorella vulgaris
    Kalhor, Aadel Xaaldi
    Nassab, Adel Dabbagh Mohammadi
    Abedi, Ehsan
    Bahrami, Ahmad
    Movafeghi, Ali
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 222 : 190 - 194
  • [42] Techno-economic assessment of biodiesel production from canola oil through ultrasonic cavitation
    Gholami, Ali
    Pourfayaz, Fathollah
    Maleki, Akbar
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 : 266 - 277
  • [43] Enhancement of biodiesel production in Chlorella vulgaris cultivation using silica nanoparticles
    Jeon, Hong-Seop
    Park, So Eun
    Ahn, Bohye
    Kim, Young-Kee
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING, 2017, 22 (02) : 136 - 141
  • [44] Biodiesel Production by Lipids From Indonesian strain of Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris
    Purkan, Purkan
    Nidianti, Ersalina
    Abdulloh, Abdulloh
    Safa, Abdillah
    Retnowati, Wiwin
    Soemarjati, Wiwie
    Nurlaila, Hamida
    Kim, Seung Wook
    OPEN CHEMISTRY, 2019, 17 (01): : 919 - 926
  • [45] Techno-Economic Assessment of APS-Based Poultry Feed Production with a Circular Biorefinery Process
    Buccaro, Marta
    Toscano, Armando
    Balzarotti, Melissa
    Re, Ilaria
    Bosco, Diego
    Bettiga, Maurizio
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [46] Comparison of feedstocks and technologies for biodiesel production: An environmental and techno-economic evaluation
    Rincon, L. E.
    Jaramillo, J. J.
    Cardona, C. A.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 69 : 479 - 487
  • [47] Techno-economic feasibility of waste biorefinery: Using slaughtering, waste streams as starting material for biopolyester production
    Shahzad, Khurram
    Narodoslawsky, Michael
    Sagir, Muhammad
    Ali, Nadeem
    Ali, Shahid
    Rashid, Muhammad Imtiaz
    Ismail, Iqbal Mohammad Ibrahim
    Koller, Martin
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 67 : 73 - 85
  • [48] Pilot scale production of biodiesel from Azolla oil via heterogeneous catalysis and diesel engine analysis: kinetic and techno-economic analysis considerations
    Rupesh, K. J.
    Madhan, S.
    Prabu, Santhosh B.
    Prabakaran, S.
    Arumugam, A.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2024, 46 (01) : 2377 - 2404
  • [49] Integrating bioremediation of textile wastewater with biodiesel production using microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris)
    Fazal, Tahir
    Rehman, Muhammad Saif Ur
    Javed, Fahed
    Akhtar, Mueed
    Mushtaq, Azeem
    Hafeez, Ainy
    Din, Aamir Alaud
    Iqbal, Javed
    Rashid, Naim
    Rehman, Fahad
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2021, 281
  • [50] Techno-economic and environmental assessment of biogas production from banana peel (Musa paradisiaca) in a biorefinery concept
    Anderson Martinez-Ruano, Jimmy
    Sthefania Caballero-Galvan, Ashley
    Lorena Restrepo-Serna, Daissy
    Ariel Cardona, Carlos
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (36) : 35971 - 35980