Machine learning in predicting heart failure survival: a review of current models and future prospects

被引:3
作者
Kokori, Emmanuel [1 ]
Patel, Ravi [2 ]
Olatunji, Gbolahan [1 ]
Ukoaka, Bonaventure Michael [3 ]
Abraham, Israel Charles [1 ]
Ajekiigbe, Victor Oluwatomiwa [4 ]
Kwape, Julia Mimi [5 ]
Babalola, Adetola Emmanuel [6 ]
Udam, Ntishor Gabriel [7 ]
Aderinto, Nicholas [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilorin, Dept Med & Surg, Ilorin, Nigeria
[2] Methodist Hlth Syst, Dept Internal Med, Dallas, TX 75237 USA
[3] Asokoro Dist Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Abuja, Nigeria
[4] Ladoke Akintola Univ Technol, Dept Med & Surg, Ogbomosho, Nigeria
[5] Univ Botswana, Sch Med, Gaborone, Botswana
[6] Univ Ibadan, Coll Med, Fac Dent, Ibadan, Nigeria
[7] Univ Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
关键词
Machine learning; Heart failure; Survival prediction; Predictive models; Clinical decision support;
D O I
10.1007/s10741-024-10474-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Heart failure is a complex and prevalent condition with significant implications for patient management and survival prediction. Traditional predictive models often fall short in accuracy due to their reliance on pre-specified predictors and assumptions of variable independence. This review aims to assess the role of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting heart failure survival, comparing their performance with traditional statistical methods and identifying key predictive features. We conducted a review of studies utilizing ML algorithms for heart failure survival prediction. Data were sourced from PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Embase, DOAJ, and the Cochrane Library, covering studies published until July 2024. A total of 10 studies were reviewed, encompassing 468,171 patients with heart failure. ML algorithms, particularly random forests and gradient boosting methods, demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional statistical models. These algorithms effectively identified key risk factors and stratified patients into risk categories with high accuracy. Notably, extreme learning machine (ELM) and CatBoost models showed exceptional predictive capabilities, as indicated by metrics such as Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC). Key predictive features included ejection fraction (EF), serum creatinine (S Cr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). ML algorithms offer significant advantages in predicting heart failure survival by uncovering complex patterns and improving risk stratification. Their integration into clinical practice could lead to more personalized treatment strategies and enhanced patient outcomes. However, challenges such as data quality, model interpretability, and integration into clinical workflows need to be addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 442
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Machine Learning Methods Improve Prognostication, Identify Clinically Distinct Phenotypes, and Detect Heterogeneity in Response to Therapy in a Large Cohort of Heart Failure Patients
    Ahmad, Tariq
    Lund, Lars H.
    Rao, Pooja
    Ghosh, Rohit
    Warier, Prashant
    Vaccaro, Benjamin
    Dahlstrom, Ulf
    O'Connor, Christopher M.
    Felker, G. Michael
    Desai, Nihar R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (08):
  • [2] Survival prediction among heart patients using machine learning techniques
    Almazroi, Abdulwahab Ali
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 19 (01) : 134 - 145
  • [3] Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in heart failure
    Averbuch, Tauben
    Sullivan, Kristen
    Sauer, Andrew
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Voors, Adriaan A.
    Gale, Chris P.
    Metra, Marco
    Ravindra, Neal
    Van Spall, Harriette G. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 3 (02): : 311 - 322
  • [4] Derivation and validation of a two-variable index to predict 30-day outcomes following heart failure hospitalization
    Averbuch, Tauben
    Lee, Shun Fu
    Mamas, Mamas Andreas
    Oz, Urun Erbas
    Perez, Richard
    Connolly, Stuart James
    Ko, Dennis Tien-Wei
    Van Spall, Harriette Gillian Christine
    [J]. ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (04): : 2690 - 2697
  • [5] Machine learning-based prediction of heart failure readmission or death: implications of choosing the right model and the right metrics
    Awan, Saqib Ejaz
    Bennamoun, Mohammed
    Sohel, Ferdous
    Sanfilippo, Frank Mario
    Dwivedi, Girish
    [J]. ESC HEART FAILURE, 2019, 6 (02): : 428 - 435
  • [6] Balogh EP, 2015, IMPROVING DIAGNOSIS IN HEALTH CARE, P1, DOI 10.17226/21794
  • [7] The Treatment of Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Doubts and New Developments from the Last ESC Guidelines
    Beltrami, Matteo
    Milli, Massimo
    Dei, Lorenzo Lupo
    Palazzuoli, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [8] Palliative care in heart failure guidelines: A comparison of the 2021 ESC and the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines on heart failure
    Blum, Moritz
    Goldstein, Nathan E.
    Jaarsma, Tiny
    Allen, Larry A.
    Gelfman, Laura P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 (10) : 1849 - 1855
  • [9] Heart Failure Epidemiology and Outcomes Statistics: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America
    Bozkurt, Biykem
    Ahmad, Tariq
    Alexander, Kevin M.
    Baker, William L.
    Bosak, Kelly
    Breathett, Khadijah
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Heidenreich, Paul
    Ho, Jennifer E.
    Hsich, Eileen
    Ibrahim, Nasrien E.
    Jones, Lenette M.
    Khan, Sadiya S.
    Khazanie, Prateeti
    Koelling, Todd
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Khush, Kiran K.
    Lee, Christopher
    Morris, Alanna A.
    Page, Robert L.
    Pandey, Ambarish
    Piano, Mariann R.
    Stehlik, Josef
    Stevenson, Lynne Warner
    Teerlink, John R.
    Vaduganathan, Muthiah
    Ziaeian, Boback
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2023, 29 (10) : 1412 - 1451
  • [10] careerfoundry.com, WHAT IS RANDOM FORES