Measuring characteristics of wild and cultivated food environments: a scoping review

被引:0
作者
Farrell, Penny [1 ]
Reeve, Erica [2 ]
Johnson, Ellen [1 ]
Farmery, Anna K. [3 ]
Patay, Dori [1 ]
Thow, Anne Marie [1 ]
Wu, Jonathan [1 ]
Bogard, Jessica R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Level 5,Moore Coll CG2,1 King St, Newtown, NSW 2042, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Global Obes Ctr, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Wollongong, Australian Natl Ctr Ocean Resources & Secur ANCORS, Wollongong, Australia
[4] CSIRO, Agr & Food, 306 Carmody Rd St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia
来源
BMC MEDICINE | 2024年 / 22卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Food environments; Wild; Cultivated; Natural; Environmental sustainability; SMALLHOLDER FARMING SYSTEMS; DIETARY DIVERSITY; AGRICULTURAL DIVERSITY; GARDENING PRACTICES; NUTRITION SECURITY; SELF-SUFFICIENCY; RURAL HOUSEHOLDS; URBAN-COMMUNITY; CONSUMPTION; AGROBIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12916-024-03678-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Global food systems are essential to sustain life; however, unhealthy diets are the leading cause of poor health and death worldwide. Natural food environments are a critical source of healthful food such as fresh fruit and vegetables, lean meat and aquatic foods, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and Indigenous food systems. Understanding and monitoring natural food environments is critical to protecting the supply of healthy food, and the land and water it comes from, for current and future generations.MethodsA scoping review was applied to classify and summarise empirical methods and measures used for characterising natural food environments. The ways in which food environment characteristics are conceptualised and measured for natural (wild and cultivated) food environments were explored. Data were extracted from the included studies using the following fields: study country, aim/objective(s), type of natural food environment (wild vs. cultivated), method or measure used to measure the food environment, key food environment characteristic/s (up to four) measured and key findings in relation to the food environment measurement.ResultsOne hundred forty seven studies were found to be relevant in this review. Most studies investigated food environments in LMICs, with almost two-thirds of all studies focussing on middle-income countries (n = 89, 61%). There was a strong focus on food security and home-based agriculture from studies that measured the cultivated food environment in LMICs, while the majority of studies on the cultivated food environment from high-income countries focussed on urban and community gardening. In addition to the most common survey-based methodological approaches, our review yielded a broad range of both qualitative and quantitative methods for measuring natural food environments, such as geospatial analysis; biochemical analysis of food, soil and water; citizen science; photovoice and food availability calendars.ConclusionsOur review demonstrated that the concept and characteristics of the food environment are a promising conceptualization for measuring natural food environments, particularly in relation to food availability, healthiness and food security. Mapping the currently used methods and measures to assess natural food environments is important to help identify critical leverage points for strengthening policy interventions, and monitoring and evaluation of progress.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fifteen Years of NOVA Food-Processing Classification: "Friend or Foe" Among Sustainable Diet Indicators? A Scoping Review
    Tompa, Orsolya
    Kiss, Anna
    Soos, Sandor
    Lakner, Zoltan
    Raner, Ana
    Kasza, Gyula
    Szakos, David
    NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2025,
  • [42] Issues in Measuring the Healthiness of Food Environments and Interpreting Relationships with Diet, Obesity and Related Health Outcomes
    Gary Sacks
    Ella Robinson
    Adrian J. Cameron
    Current Obesity Reports, 2019, 8 : 98 - 111
  • [43] Issues in Measuring the Healthiness of Food Environments and Interpreting Relationships with Diet, Obesity and Related Health Outcomes
    Sacks, Gary
    Robinson, Ella
    Cameron, Adrian J.
    CURRENT OBESITY REPORTS, 2019, 8 (02) : 98 - 111
  • [44] The Social, Behavioral, and Psychological Predictors of Young Women's Food Choices: A Scoping Review
    Smith, Jane Lankes
    Comeau, Madeline E.
    Hess, Julie M.
    NUTRIENTS, 2025, 17 (06)
  • [45] Food and alcohol disturbance among US college students: a mixed methods scoping review
    Shepherd, Caitlin B.
    Berry, Katherine A.
    Ye, Xian
    Li, Kathie
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 2023, 71 (06) : 1715 - 1731
  • [46] Food systems thinking unpacked: a scoping review on industrial diets among adolescents in Ghana
    Sambu, Winnie Chepng'etich
    Picchioni, Fiorella
    Stevano, Sara
    Codjoe, Emmanuel A.
    Nkegbe, Paul Kwame
    Turner, Christopher
    FOOD SECURITY, 2024, 16 (01) : 79 - 114
  • [47] Scoping Review of Research on the Effectiveness of Food-Safety Education Interventions Directed at Consumers
    Sivaramalingam, Bhairavi
    Young, Ian
    Pham, Mai T.
    Waddell, Lisa
    Greig, Judy
    Mascarenhas, Mariola
    Papadopoulos, Andrew
    FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2015, 12 (07) : 561 - 570
  • [48] Healthy eating beliefs and the meaning of food in populations with a low socioeconomic position: A scoping review
    van der Heijden, Amy
    te Molder, Hedwig
    Jager, Gerry
    Mulder, Bob C.
    APPETITE, 2021, 161
  • [49] What Motivates Consumer Food Safety Perceptions and Beliefs? A Scoping Review in BRICS Countries
    Zanetta, Luis D'Avoglio
    Mucinhato, Raisa Moreira Dardaque
    Hakim, Mariana Piton
    Stedefeldt, Elke
    da Cunha, Diogo Thimoteo
    FOODS, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [50] Gathering of Wild Food Plants in Anthropogenic Environments across the Seasons: Implications for Poor and Vulnerable Farm Households
    Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S.
    Price, Lisa L.
    ECOLOGY OF FOOD AND NUTRITION, 2014, 53 (04) : 363 - 389