Critical view of safety approach vs. infundibular technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which one is safer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Aburayya, Bahaa I. [1 ]
Al-Hayk, Ahmad K. [1 ]
Toubasi, Ahmad A. [2 ]
Ali, Abubaker [3 ]
Shahait, Awni D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[2] Univ Jordan, Fac Med, Amman 11942, Jordan
[3] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Michael & Marian Ilitch Dept Surg, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, 305 West Jackson Street, Suite 206, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Bile duct injury; Common bile duct; Critical view of safety; Infundibular technique; BILE-DUCT INJURY; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; DELPHI CONSENSUS; OPERATIVE TIME; RISK-FACTORS; SURGERY; IMPACT; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-024-02029-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains the gold standard procedure for the management of benign gallbladder disease. Recognizing the need to mitigate complications, mainly bile duct injury (BDI), various techniques for ductal identification during LC have emerged, including the "Critical View of Safety" (CVS) and the infundibular technique (IT). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess and compare the outcomes of both techniques, with a primary focus on evaluating their impact on BDIs. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases. The search focused on the surgical technique, incidences of minor and major BDIs, operative time, conversion rate, and length of stay, among patients undergoing LC for benign gallbladder disease. Our initial search retrieved 264 studies. After screening the unique studies against our predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, only five met our criteria and were included. Additionally, a manual search identified eight more relevant studies, bringing the total number of included studies to 13. The total number of included patients was 4,837. Approximately two-thirds underwent LC using the CVS approach (61.1%), and 66.3% were female, with a mean age of 44.4 +/- 11.2 years. The CVS approach was associated with a significant reduction in overall BDIs (RR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.18-0.71) and major BDIs (RR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.63). However, there were no significant differences in terms of minor BDIs, operative time, conversion rates, or length of stay. Our study demonstrated the superiority of the CVS approach in terms of reducing the incidence of overall and major BDIs compared to IT. However, our study revealed no other significant differences between the two techniques. Further research, including multicentric randomized controlled trials, will be necessary to further evaluate the efficacy of these techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 45
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [41] SOPER NJ, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P917
  • [42] How often do surgeons obtain the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
    Stefanidis, Dimitrios
    Chintalapudi, Nikita
    Anderson-Montoya, Brittany
    Oommen, Bindhu
    Tobben, Daniel
    Pimentel, Manuel
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (01): : 142 - 146
  • [43] The "hidden cystic duct" syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy - the danger of the false infundibulum
    Strasberg, SM
    Eagon, CJ
    Drebin, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 191 (06) : 661 - 667
  • [44] Subtotal Cholecystectomy-"Fenestrating" vs "Reconstituting" Subtypes and the Prevention of Bile Duct Injury: Definition of the Optimal Procedure in Difficult Operative Conditions
    Strasberg, Steven M.
    Pucci, Michael J.
    Brunt, L. Michael
    Deziel, Daniel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 222 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [45] Rationale and Use of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Strasberg, Steven M.
    Brunt, L. Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (01) : 132 - 138
  • [46] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study assessing the impact of grade of operating surgeon on operative time and 30-day morbidity
    Tafazal, H.
    Spreadborough, P.
    Zakai, D.
    Shastri-Hurst, N.
    Ayaani, S.
    Hanif, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2018, 100 (03) : 178 - 184
  • [47] Critical View of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Vettoretto, Nereo
    Saronni, Cristiano
    Harbi, Asaf
    Balestra, Luca
    Taglietti, Lucio
    Giovanetti, Maurizio
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2011, 15 (03) : 322 - 325
  • [48] Voruganti M., 2022, INT J SURG SCI, V6, P01, DOI [10.33545/surgery.2022.v6.i1a.805, DOI 10.33545/SURGERY.2022.V6.I1A.805]
  • [49] Wafa A, 2019, SAUDI J MED, DOI [10.36348/sjm.2019.v04i01.004, DOI 10.36348/SJM.2019.V04I01.004]
  • [50] Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos)
    Wakabayashi, Go
    Iwashita, Yukio
    Hibi, Taizo
    Takada, Tadahiro
    Strasberg, Steven M.
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Endo, Itaru
    Umezawa, Akiko
    Asai, Koji
    Suzuki, Kenji
    Mori, Yasuhisa
    Okamoto, Kohji
    Pitt, Henry A.
    Han, Ho-Seong
    Hwang, Tsann-Long
    Yoon, Yoo-Seok
    Yoon, Dong-Sup
    Choi, In-Seok
    Huang, Wayne Shih-Wei
    Eduardo Gimenez, Mariano
    Garden, O. James
    Gouma, Dirk J.
    Belli, Giulio
    Dervenis, Christos
    Jagannath, Palepu
    Chan, Angus C. W.
    Lau, Wan Yee
    Liu, Keng-Hao
    Su, Cheng-Hsi
    Misawa, Takeyuki
    Nakamura, Masafumi
    Horiguchi, Akihiko
    Tagaya, Nobumi
    Fujioka, Shuichi
    Higuchi, Ryota
    Shikata, Satoru
    Noguchi, Yoshinori
    Ukai, Tomohiko
    Yokoe, Masamichi
    Cherqui, Daniel
    Honda, Goro
    Sugioka, Atsushi
    de Santibanes, Eduardo
    Supe, Avinash Nivritti
    Tokumura, Hiromi
    Kimura, Taizo
    Yoshida, Masahiro
    Mayumi, Toshihiko
    Kitano, Seigo
    Inomata, Masafumi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2018, 25 (01) : 73 - 86