Measurement Invariance of the Adult Hope Scale across Race/Ethnicity and Gender

被引:0
作者
Matthew W. Gallagher [1 ]
Zachary S. Ayers [1 ]
Elijah R. Murphy [1 ]
Amy R. Senger [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, University of Houston, 4349 Martin Luther King Blvd, Rm 373, Houston, TX
关键词
Assessment; Gender; Hope; Measurement Invariance; Race/Ethnicity;
D O I
10.1007/s41042-024-00207-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hope is a cognitive trait defined as the perceived capacity to identify strategies (pathways) and maintain motivation (agency) in the pursuit of goals. Hope is most commonly measured using the Adult Hope Scale (AHS). Past work has provided support for the factor structure and reliability of the AHS, but there is limited evidence of measurement invariance of the AHS. The present study examined measurement invariance across race/ethnicity and gender in a large and diverse (n = 3495; 76.9% Women, 32.9% Hispanic, 32.3% Asian/Pacific Islander, 22.1% White, and 12.7% Black/African American) sample of young adults in the United States. Results supported scalar measurement invariance across all race/ethnicity and gender groups and minimal differences in associations between the agency and pathways components of hope or mean levels of hope across groups with the exception of Asian adults reporting lower levels of hope than other groups. These results provide clear empirical support for the consistency of the factor structure and assessment of hope across race/ethnicity and gender and provide an important foundation for examining the potential benefits of hope across diverse populations. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Alarcon G.M., Bowling N.A., Khazon S., Great expectations: A meta-analytic examination of optimism and hope, Personality and individual differences, 54, 7, pp. 821-827, (2013)
[2]  
Babyak M.A., Snyder C., Yoshinobu L., Psychometric properties of the hope scale: A confirmatory factor analysis, Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 2, pp. 154-169, (1993)
[3]  
Bandura A., Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, (1997)
[4]  
Bentler P.M., Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 2, pp. 238-246, (1990)
[5]  
Bentler P.M., Bonett D.G., Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 3, pp. 588-606, (1980)
[6]  
Brouwer D., Meijer R.R., Weekers A.M., Baneke J., On the dimensionality of the dispositional hope scale, Psychological Assessment, 20, 3, pp. 310-315, (2008)
[7]  
Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., Segerstrom S.C., Optimism, Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 7, pp. 879-889, (2010)
[8]  
Cheavens J.S., Heiy J.E., Feldman D., Benitez C., Rand K.L., Hope, goals, and pathways: Further validating the hope scale with observer ratings, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14, 4, pp. 452-462, (2018)
[9]  
Cheavens J.S., Whitted W.M., Hope therapy, Current Opinion in Psychology, 49, (2023)
[10]  
Chen F.F., Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance, Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 3, pp. 464-504, (2007)