Cone beam computed tomography based upper airway measurement after orthognathic surgery: a comparative evaluation of different imaging software

被引:0
|
作者
Mini, Andreas Helmuth Iti [1 ]
Wegner, Hannes [2 ]
Lonic, Daniel [2 ,4 ]
Loeffelbein, Denys J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Univ Clin Rechts Isar, Polyclin Maxillofacial Surg, Ismaningerstr 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] MCLINIC, Interdisciplinary Specialist Ctr, Schutzeneck 8, D-81241 Munich, Germany
[3] Helios Clin Munich West, Clin Maxillofacial Surg & Plast Surg, Steinerweg 5, D-81241 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Regensburg, Regensburg Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Hand & Reconstruct Surg, Regensburg, Germany
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Orthognathic surgery; Cone-beam computed tomography; Upper airway; Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; Software comparison; OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA; PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY; RELIABILITY; CT; SEGMENTATION; ADVANCEMENT; OROPHARYNX; GUIDELINE; ACCURACY; SPACE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-83890-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enhances understanding of the upper airway (UA). This study compared three software products' abilities in visualizing and quantifying specific upper airway changes using CBCT. We conducted a retrospective analysis of pre- and post-operative CBCT images from 29 patients using Dolphin (Do), Romexis 5 (Ro5), and Romexis 6 (Ro6) software, focusing on alterations in oropharyngeal volume and minimum cross-sectional area as key indicators of orthognathic surgery outcomes. ANOVA analysis showed significant differences in volume measurements between Do/Ro5 (p = 0.034) and Do/Ro6 (p = 0.047), but no difference between Ro5 and Ro6 (p = 0.685). No significant differences were found in minimum cross-sectional area parameters. Despite standardized protocols, interpretation discrepancies exist between Do and Ro 5/6, possibly due to program-specific properties. Further studies on threshold value comparability are needed for data standardization. Direct comparisons of clinical data from Do, Ro5, and Ro6 are limited due to methodological disparities. Nonetheless, these programs allow reproducible and quantifiable measurements for clinical assessments of these specific airway changes following orthognathic surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Tool for Geometrical Measurements of Orthognathic Surgery Changes Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
    Prakash, Mithilesh
    Peltomaki, Timo
    Eskola, Hannu
    XIV MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTING 2016, 2016, 57 : 430 - 433
  • [22] Upper airway imaging in sleep-disordered breathing: role of cone-beam computed tomography
    Noura A. Alsufyani
    Michelle L. Noga
    Manisha Witmans
    Paul W. Major
    Oral Radiology, 2017, 33 : 161 - 169
  • [23] Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of Upper Airway Measurements in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
    Momany, Suleiman M.
    AlJamal, Ghaida'
    Shugaa-Addin, Bassam
    Khader, Yousef S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 352 (04) : 376 - 384
  • [24] Comparative analysis of upper airway volume with lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography
    Feng, Xin
    Li, Gang
    Qu, Zhenyu
    Liu, Lin
    Nasstrom, Karin
    Shi, Xie-Qi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 147 (02) : 197 - 204
  • [25] Correlation between oral cavity volume and upper airway changes in skeletal Class III patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a pilot cone-beam computed tomography study
    Li, Gen
    Chen, Zhenwei
    Li, Yingyi
    Cai, Guanhui
    Ruan, Xiaolei
    Wang, Ting
    Guan, Zhaolan
    Sun, Lian
    Wang, Wei
    Sun, Wen
    Wang, Hua
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2024, 94 (04) : 432 - 440
  • [26] Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis protocols for condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
    Verhelst, P. J.
    Verstraete, L.
    Shaheen, E.
    Shujaat, S.
    Darche, V
    Jacobs, R.
    Swennen, G.
    Politis, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (02) : 207 - 217
  • [27] Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images
    Chen, Hui
    van Eijnatten, Maureen
    Wolff, Jan
    de lange, Jan
    van der Stelt, Paul F.
    Lobbezoo, Frank
    Aarab, Ghizlane
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (06)
  • [28] Reliability assessment of craniofacial and airway measurements: a comparative study between multidetector computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography
    Sun, Jui-Sheng
    Hung, Min-Chih
    Hsieh, Chi-Yeh
    Lin, Shih-Ying
    Tai, Han-Cheng
    Chang, Jenny Zwei-Chieng
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2025, 95 (01) : 57 - 77
  • [29] Upper airway changes after Xbow appliance therapy evaluated with cone beam computed tomography
    Erbas, Banu
    Kocadereli, Ilken
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2014, 84 (04) : 693 - 700
  • [30] Upper airway expansion after rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with cone beam computed tomography
    Cunha Ribeiro, Annelise Nazareth
    de Paiva, Joao Batista
    Rino-Neto, Jose
    Illipronti-Filho, Edson
    Trivino, Tarcila
    Fantini, Solange Mongelli
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2012, 82 (03) : 458 - 463