Gastroesophageal reflux disease as a risk factor for oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study

被引:0
作者
Shen, Zixiong [1 ]
Wang, Chuanlei [2 ,3 ]
Cao, Chunli [4 ]
Wang, Guangyi [2 ,3 ]
Li, Zhiqin [5 ]
机构
[1] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Thorac Surg, Changchun 130000, Peoples R China
[2] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Gen Surg Ctr, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Changchun 130000, Peoples R China
[3] Hlth Dept Jilin Prov, Key Lab Gen Surg, Changchun 130000, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Stomatol, Nanchang 330000, Peoples R China
[5] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Surg Intens Care Unit, 277 West Yanta Rd, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer; Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; Oral cavity cancer; Oropharynx cancer; Mendelian randomization; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; HEAD; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ASSOCIATION; INSTRUMENTS; LARYNX; INFLAMMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12672-025-02105-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundPrevious observational studies have not clearly examined the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on the risk of oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer (OCPC). To provide more evidence to elucidate this issue, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to analyze the causal effect of GERD on OCPC and its subtypes.MethodsWe obtained the summary data of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of European ancestry to perform MR analysis. GERD was considered the exposure, and OCPC (subtypes include oral cavity cancer (OCC) and oropharynx cancer (OPC)) was defined as the outcome. We aimed to investigate whether GERD has a causal effect on OCPC. We then attempted to obtain more accurate causal estimates by correcting for potential confounders such as smoking behavior, drinking behavior, body mass index (BMI), and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We also performed extensive sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the primary analysis results.ResultsUnivariate MR analysis showed that GERD had a positive causal effect on OCPC (IVW: discovery, OR = 2.09 (95% CI 1.30-3.37), P = 0.0023; validation, OR = 1.90 (95% CI 1.26-2.87), P = 0.0020) and OCC (IVW: discovery, OR = 2.01 (95% CI: 1.21-3.33), P = 0.0066; validation, OR = 2.60 (95% CI 1.47-4.59), P = 0.0010). Although GERD increased the risk of OPC, this effect was statistically significant only in the discovery analysis (IVW: discovery, OR = 2.30 (95% CI 1.08-4.89), P = 0.0307; validation, OR = 1.15 (95% CI 0.67-1.97), P = 0.6199), the causal direction remained consistent. After adjusting for smoking, alcohol consumption, BMI, and T2D in multivariate analysis, the results remained largely consistent.ConclusionsOur study showed that GERD significantly increased the overall risk of OCPC, and similar results were found for its subtype OCC. This causal effect appears to be independent of cigarette use, drinking habits, BMI, and T2D. However, evidence for a causal effect of GERD on OPC is limited, and further research is expected to extend this finding. Future studies should explore the specific biological mechanisms through which GERD increases OCPC risk.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption [J].
Bowden, Jack ;
Del Greco, Fabiola M. ;
Minelli, Cosetta ;
Zhao, Qingyuan ;
Lawlor, Debbie A. ;
Sheehan, Nuala A. ;
Thompson, John ;
Smith, George Davey .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (03) :728-742
[2]   A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization [J].
Bowden, Jack ;
Del Greco, Fabiola M. ;
Minelli, Cosetta ;
Smith, George Davey ;
Sheehan, Nuala ;
Thompson, John .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (11) :1783-1802
[3]   Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic [J].
Bowden, Jack ;
Del Greco, Fabiola M. ;
Minelli, Cosetta ;
Smith, George Davey ;
Sheehan, Nuala A. ;
Thompson, John R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (06) :1961-1974
[4]   Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator [J].
Bowden, Jack ;
Smith, George Davey ;
Haycock, Philip C. ;
Burgess, Stephen .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 40 (04) :304-314
[5]   Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression [J].
Bowden, Jack ;
Smith, George Davey ;
Burgess, Stephen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (02) :512-525
[6]   Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies [J].
Brion, Marie-Jo A. ;
Shakhbazov, Konstantin ;
Visscher, Peter M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (05) :1497-1501
[7]   Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates [J].
Burgess, Stephen ;
Labrecque, Jeremy A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 33 (10) :947-952
[8]   Gastroesophageal reflux disease and odds of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in North Carolina [J].
Busch, Evan L. ;
Zevallos, Jose P. ;
Olshan, Andrew F. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2016, 126 (05) :1091-1096
[9]   The Role of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Airway Inflammation [J].
Chan, Walter W. ;
Sharma, Nirmal ;
Gyawali, C. Prakash .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2025, 120 (01) :60-64
[10]   The Epidemiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma [J].
Coleman, Helen G. ;
Xie, Shao-Hua ;
Lagergren, Jesper .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (02) :390-405