24-hour movement behavior adherence and associations with health outcomes: an umbrella review

被引:5
作者
Chelsea L. Kracht [1 ]
Sarah Burkart [2 ]
Claire I. Groves [3 ]
Guilherme Moraes Balbim [4 ]
Christopher D. Pfledderer [5 ]
Carah D. Porter [7 ]
Christine W. St. Laurent [6 ]
Emily K. Johnson [3 ]
Denver M. Y. Brown [7 ]
机构
[1] University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, 66160, KS
[2] Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, 29208, SC
[3] The University of Texas at San Antonio, 1 UTSA Circle, San Antonio, 78249, TX
[4] The University of British Columbia, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, BC
[5] School of Public Health in Austin, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, Austin, 78701, TX
[6] The University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, 01003, MA
[7] Department of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, 1105 Sunset Ave, Manhattan, 66502, KS
来源
Journal of Activity, Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors | / 3卷 / 1期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Adherence; Physical activity; Screen-time; Sedentary behavior; Sitting time; Sleep;
D O I
10.1186/s44167-024-00064-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep, collectively known as the 24-hour movement behaviors, demonstrate individual and joint benefits on physical and mental health. Examination of these behaviors has expanded beyond guideline adherence to reviews of isotemporal substitution models (ISM) and compositional data analysis (CoDA). This umbrella review sought to review existing systematic reviews to (1) characterize the breadth and scope, (2) examine prevalence estimates for 24-hour movement guideline adherence, and (3) examine the relationship between these behaviors with health outcomes based on various approaches. Methods: Eight databases and multiple supplementary strategies were used to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses that included two or more of the three 24-hour movement behaviors and a multi-behavior assessment approach. Overall review characteristics, movement behavior definitions, approaches, and health outcomes assessed were extracted, and methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool. Review characteristics (Aim 1), guideline prevalence estimates (Aim 2), and associations with health outcomes (Aim 3) were examined. Findings: Thirty-two reviews (20 systematic reviews, 10 meta-analyses, and 2 pooled analyses) were included. Reviews captured the entire lifespan, global regions, and several physical and mental health outcomes. Individual and total guideline adherence waned from preschool to adolescence, but reviews reported similar prevalence estimates and ranges (i.e., within 10%). Common approaches included ISM and CoDA, evaluating 24-hour movement behavior’s interactive associations with health outcomes, guideline adherence, and profile-based analysis. Despite heterogeneous approaches, reviews found consistent evidence for beneficial associations between meeting all three guidelines and high amount of physical activity on physical and mental health outcomes, but varied assessment of sedentary behavior or sleep. Most reviews were rated as low or critically low quality. Conclusions: The breadth and scope of current reviews on 24-hour movement behaviors was wide and varied in this umbrella review, including all ages and across the globe. Prevalence estimates among populations beyond children need to be synthesized. Amongst the variety of definitions and approaches, reviews found benefit from achieving healthy amounts of all three behaviors. Longitudinal multi-behavior original research studies with rigorous assessment of sleep and sedentary behavior may help improve future systematic reviews of these various approaches. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Poitras V.J., Gray C.E., Borghese M.M., Et al., Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth, Appl Physiol Nutr Metabolism Jun, 41, 6, pp. S197-S239, (2016)
[2]  
Chaput J.P., Gray C.E., Poitras V.J., Et al., Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years), Bmc Public Health, 17, (2017)
[3]  
Carson V., Hunter S., Kuzik N., Et al., Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth: an update, Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Jun, 41, 6 Suppl 3, pp. S240-S265, (2016)
[4]  
Janssen I., Clarke A.E., Carson V., Et al., A systematic review of compositional data analysis studies examining associations between sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity with health outcomes in adults, Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Oct, 45, 10, pp. S248-S257, (2020)
[5]  
Chaput J.P., Gray C.E., Poitras V.J., Et al., Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in school-aged children and youth, Appl Physiol Nutr Metabolism Jun, 41, 6, pp. S266-S282, (2016)
[6]  
Groves C.I., Huong C., Porter C.D., Et al., Associations between 24-h movement behaviors and indicators of mental health and well-being across the lifespan: A systematic review, J Activity Sedentary Sleep Behav, 3, (2024)
[7]  
Wendt A., da Silva I.C.M., Goncalves H., Menezes A., Barros F., Wehrmeister F.C., Short-term effect of physical activity on sleep health: a population-based study using accelerometry, J Sport Health Sci Sep, 11, 5, pp. 630-638, (2022)
[8]  
Chaput J.P., Carson V., Gray C.E., Tremblay M.S., Importance of all movement behaviors in a 24 hour period for overall health, Int J Environ Res Public Health Dec, 4, 12, pp. 12575-12581, (2014)
[9]  
Tremblay M.S., Carson V., Chaput J.P., Et al., Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep, Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Jun, 41, 6 Suppl 3, pp. S311-S327, (2016)
[10]  
Willumsen J., Bull F., Development of WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and Sleep for Children Less Than 5 years of age, J Phys Act Health Jan, 1, 1, pp. 96-100, (2020)