Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement by scleral Schiotz and Goldmann applanation tonometer

被引:0
|
作者
Shaikh, Zeba Muzammil [1 ]
Rajalakshmi, A. R. [1 ]
Nagarajan, Swathi [1 ]
Lokeshmaran, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Deemed Be Univ, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth SBV, Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Res Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Pondicherry, India
[2] Deemed Be Univ, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth SBV, Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Res Inst, Dept Community Med, Pondicherry, India
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Corneal IOP; Intraocular pressure estimation; Ocular rigidity; Predictive formula for IOP; Schiotz tonometer; Scleral biomechanics; Scleral IOP; CORNEAL; PNEUMATONOMETRY; THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-79403-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Aim & background : Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured through the sclera has some advantages over IOP measured through cornea. This study aimed to determine the agreement between IOP as estimated by scleral Schiotz (SS) tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, IOP was measured by GAT on the cornea and Schiotz tonometer on the temporal sclera. Axial length and central corneal thickness (CCT) were noted. IOP was then estimated from SS IOP as eGAT using a predictive formula. Agreement of IOP corrected for CCT (cGAT) with eGAT and SS IOP were assessed. The effects of age, axial length, refraction, CCT, gender, and ocular and systemic comorbidity on measured IOP were also assessed. Results: The study included 155 patients with a mean age of 54.27 +/- 10.02 years. Mean IOP measured by GAT and scleral Schiotz were 16.58 +/- 2.76 mm Hg and 16.10 +/- 2.96 mm Hg, respectively. The mean IOP by cGAT and eGAT were 16.70 +/- 2.80 mm Hg and 17.07 +/- 3.10 mm Hg, respectively. Both eGAT & SS IOP had good agreement with cGAT on the Bland-Altmann plot (p = 0.96 & 0.51, respectively). Further, SS IOP showed good agreement even with GAT IOP (p = 0.78). Age, axial length, refraction, central corneal thickness, gender, and ocular and systemic comorbidity did not show significant correlation with IOP measurement. Conclusion: Estimated GAT IOP showed good agreement with measured GAT values. SS IOP also agreed well with GAT IOP. Clinical significance IOP measurement on the sclera using Schiotz can be used as an alternative to GAT.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas
    Akkan, J. C. Umurhan
    Akkan, F.
    Akcay, B. I. Sezgin
    Ayintap, E.
    Tuncer, K.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2015, 232 (10) : 1190 - 1197
  • [22] Central and peripheral intraocular pressure measured by a rebound tonometer
    Yamashita, Tsutomu
    Miki, Atsushi
    Ieki, Yoshiaki
    Kiryu, Junichi
    Yaoeda, Kiyoshi
    Shirakashi, Motohiro
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 5 : 1113 - 1118
  • [23] The Impact of Corneal Edema on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: An In Vitro Model
    Neuburger, Matthias
    Maier, Philip
    Boehringer, Daniel
    Reinhard, Thomas
    Jordan, Jens F.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (07) : 584 - 590
  • [24] Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
    Ye, Yiming
    Yang, Yangfan
    Fan, Yanmei
    Lan, Min
    Yu, Keming
    Yu, Minbin
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2019, 28 (10) : 922 - 928
  • [25] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Three Different Methods (Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT), Corvis ST, and iCare) Following Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Tziola, Tatiana
    Tzamalis, Argyrios
    Koronis, Spyridon
    Garitsis, Panagiotis
    Tsinopoulos, Ioannis
    Ziakas, Nikolaos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (23)
  • [26] Determinants of Postoperative Corneal Edema and Impact on Goldmann Intraocular Pressure
    Huang, Yuqiang
    Zhang, Mingzhi
    Huang, Chukai
    Chen, Bin
    Lam, Dennis S. C.
    Zhang, Shaobin
    Congdon, Nathan
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (09) : 962 - 967
  • [27] Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry According to the International Ocular Tonometer Standards ISO 8612 in Glaucoma Patients
    Pahlitzsch, M.
    Gonnermann, J.
    Maier, A. K. B.
    Schwenteck, T.
    Torun, N.
    Bertelmann, E.
    Klamann, M. K.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2014, 231 (11) : 1107 - 1113
  • [28] Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST
    Ramm, Lisa
    Herber, Robert
    Spoerl, Eberhard
    Raiskup, Frederik
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    Terai, Naim
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 2019
  • [29] Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial
    McCafferty, Sean Joseph
    Tetrault, Kyle
    McColgin, Ann
    Chue, Warren
    Levine, Jason
    Muller, Melissa
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 103 (12) : 1840 - 1844
  • [30] A hypothesis that scleral contact lenses could elevate intraocular pressure
    Mcmonnies, Charles W.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2016, 99 (06) : 594 - 596