Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement by scleral Schiotz and Goldmann applanation tonometer

被引:0
|
作者
Shaikh, Zeba Muzammil [1 ]
Rajalakshmi, A. R. [1 ]
Nagarajan, Swathi [1 ]
Lokeshmaran, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Deemed Be Univ, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth SBV, Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Res Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Pondicherry, India
[2] Deemed Be Univ, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth SBV, Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Res Inst, Dept Community Med, Pondicherry, India
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Corneal IOP; Intraocular pressure estimation; Ocular rigidity; Predictive formula for IOP; Schiotz tonometer; Scleral biomechanics; Scleral IOP; CORNEAL; PNEUMATONOMETRY; THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-79403-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Aim & background : Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured through the sclera has some advantages over IOP measured through cornea. This study aimed to determine the agreement between IOP as estimated by scleral Schiotz (SS) tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, IOP was measured by GAT on the cornea and Schiotz tonometer on the temporal sclera. Axial length and central corneal thickness (CCT) were noted. IOP was then estimated from SS IOP as eGAT using a predictive formula. Agreement of IOP corrected for CCT (cGAT) with eGAT and SS IOP were assessed. The effects of age, axial length, refraction, CCT, gender, and ocular and systemic comorbidity on measured IOP were also assessed. Results: The study included 155 patients with a mean age of 54.27 +/- 10.02 years. Mean IOP measured by GAT and scleral Schiotz were 16.58 +/- 2.76 mm Hg and 16.10 +/- 2.96 mm Hg, respectively. The mean IOP by cGAT and eGAT were 16.70 +/- 2.80 mm Hg and 17.07 +/- 3.10 mm Hg, respectively. Both eGAT & SS IOP had good agreement with cGAT on the Bland-Altmann plot (p = 0.96 & 0.51, respectively). Further, SS IOP showed good agreement even with GAT IOP (p = 0.78). Age, axial length, refraction, central corneal thickness, gender, and ocular and systemic comorbidity did not show significant correlation with IOP measurement. Conclusion: Estimated GAT IOP showed good agreement with measured GAT values. SS IOP also agreed well with GAT IOP. Clinical significance IOP measurement on the sclera using Schiotz can be used as an alternative to GAT.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Schiotz Scleral Intraocular Pressure Readings Predict Goldmann Applanation Readings Better Than Rebound Tonometry
    Senthil, Sirisha
    Chary, Raghava
    Ali, Mohammed Hasnat
    Choudhari, Nikhil
    Badakere, Swathi
    Krishnamurthy, Rashmi
    Dikshit, Siddharth
    Garudadri, Chandrasekhar
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (09) : 1117 - 1123
  • [2] Estimation of Goldmann applanation tonometer intraocular pressure (IOP) from scleral Schiotz IOP values in eyes with type-1 keratoprostheses
    Senthil, Sirisha
    Chary, Raghava
    Ali, Mohammed Hasnat
    Choudhari, Nikhil S.
    Garudadri, Chandra Sekhar
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 106 (04) : 480 - 484
  • [3] Effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Hagishima, Mana
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Fujimura, Fusako
    Morita, Tetsuya
    Shoji, Nobuyuki
    Shimizu, Kimiya
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 248 (02) : 257 - 262
  • [4] Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert's ocular response analyser
    Ehrlich, J. R.
    Haseltine, S.
    Shimmyo, M.
    Radcliffe, N. M.
    EYE, 2010, 24 (10) : 1555 - 1560
  • [5] Estimation of intraocular pressure in rabbits using noncontact tonometer: A comparative evaluation with Schiotz tonometer
    Gupta, S. K.
    Saxena, R.
    Agarwal, R.
    Galpalli, N. D.
    Srivastava, S.
    Agrawal, S. S.
    METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 29 (06): : 405 - 409
  • [6] Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification
    Kiddee, Weerawat
    Tanjana, Arunee
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (04) : 317 - 324
  • [7] Intraocular Pressure Measurement Precision with the Goldmann Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometers
    Kotecha, Aachal
    White, Edward
    Schlottmann, Patricio G.
    Garway-Heath, David F.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 117 (04) : 730 - 737
  • [8] Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Versus Ocular Response Analyzer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Feizi, Sepehr
    Faramarzi, Amir
    Masoudi, Ali
    Azari, Amir A.
    Veisi, Amirreza
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 (11) : 1370 - 1375
  • [9] Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters
    Bao, FangJun
    Huang, ZiXu
    Huang, JinHai
    Wang, JunJie
    Deng, ManLi
    Li, LinNa
    Yu, AYong
    Wang, QinMei
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2016, 25 (06) : 510 - 519
  • [10] Influence of Ocular Stiffness on Intraocular Pressure Estimation Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Shirane, Masako
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    Otani, Keiko
    Kurita, Yuichi
    Kaneko, Makoto
    Takenaka, Joji
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 33 (03) : 293 - 299