Analysis of Energy Use and Environmental Impacts of Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) in Conventional and Bio-friendly Production Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Babaeian, Mahdi [1 ]
Tavassoli, Abolfazl [2 ]
Rastegaripour, Fatemeh [3 ]
Rodrigo-Comino, Jesus [4 ]
Caballero-Calvo, Andres [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bojnord, Shirvan Fac Agr, Dept Plant & Genet Prod Engn, Bojnord, Iran
[2] Payame Noor Univ, Dept Agr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Torbat Heydarieh, Dept Agr, Torbat Heydarieh, Iran
[4] Univ Granada, Dept Reg Geog Anal & Phys Geog, Granada 18071, Spain
关键词
Sustainable agriculture practices; Global warming potential (GWP); Nutrient and resource management; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle assessment; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CYCLE ASSESSMENT LCA; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; WHEAT PRODUCTION; CROP; PROVINCE; INPUTS; OIL;
D O I
10.1007/s10341-024-01252-z
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Humankind and natural ecosystems are facing global changes. There is a clear influence of human activities due to the use of contaminant energies among other factors. Therefore, it is a priority to find clean energies with less environmental impacts coming from bio-friendly production systems. Therefore, the main aim of this research is to examine energy use patterns, greenhouse gas emission (CO2, N2O, and CH4) and life cycle assessment (LCA) in pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) production systems. As experimental plots, we selected one plantation located in the North Khorasan province of Iran. Data were collected from two pistachio orchards with conventional (CPS) and with bio-friendly production systems (BPS). In 2 seasonal years, from 2020 to 2021, a functional unit of 1000 kg pistachio was used. The results indicated that total energy consumption in the conventional pistachio production system reached 58,759.86 MJ ha-1 in comparison to bio-friendly pistachio production systems with 31,149.02 MJ ha-1, accounting for 36.0% of fertilizer energy, 26% of diesel energy, and 12.7% of electricity. The energy use efficiency for the CPS and BPS was respectively 0.38 and 0.73, and also energy productivity for CPS reached 0.01 kg MJ ha-1 and BPS 0.02 kg MJ ha-1. Results indicated that the direct energy for CPS was 19.6% and for BPS 39.03%, but indirect energy inputs for CPS and BPS registered 76.4 and 60.5%, respectively. It was found that the non-renewable form of energy input for CPS was 83.8% and for BPS just 57.6%. We conclude that chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers), fuel and electricity were the most important inputs for the pistachio production system, which also influenced total CO2, N2O and CH4 emissions due to chemical inputs for CPS. In CPS and BPS, the total global warming potential (GWP) was 2445.24 and 1507.99 kg CO2eq ha-1, respectively. Compared to CPS, the application of the BPS method reduces total damage to human health, ecosystems, and resources.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Energy inputs-yield relationship and sensitivity analysis of pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) production in Markazi Region of Iran
    Afshar, R. Keshavarz
    Alipour, A.
    Hashemi, M.
    Jovini, M. Ansari
    Pimentel, D.
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2013, 11 (03) : 661 - 669
  • [2] An Investigation of the Environmental Impacts and Energy-Economic Analysis for Sugar Beet and Sugarcane Production Systems
    Firouzi, Shayan
    Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami
    Zamani, Davood Mohammad
    Ranjber, Iraj
    SUGAR TECH, 2022, 24 (06) : 1851 - 1866
  • [3] Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of wheat and potato production in conventional and organic systems
    Holka, Malgorzata
    Kowalska, Jolanta
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH, 2025, 65 (01) : 133 - 144
  • [4] Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of wheat and potato production in conventional and organic systems
    Holka, Malgorzata
    Kowalska, Jolanta
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH, 2025, : 133 - 144
  • [5] COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND CONSERVATION CULTIVATION SYSTEMS IN TERMS OF ENERGY USE AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION FOR RAPESEED (BRASSICA NAPUS L.) PRODUCTION
    Mutlu, Nusret
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2020, 29 (08): : 6400 - 6411
  • [6] Life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional food production systems, with and without bio-energy options
    Cooper, J. M.
    Butler, G.
    Leifert, C.
    NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2011, 58 (3-4) : 185 - 192
  • [7] Environmental Impacts and Benefits of Tofu Production from Organic and Conventional Soybean Cropping: Improvement Potential from Renewable Energy Use and Circular Economy Patterns
    Colimoro, Martina
    Ripa, Maddalena
    Santagata, Remo
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 10 (05)
  • [8] An Investigation of the Environmental Impacts and Energy-Economic Analysis for Sugar Beet and Sugarcane Production Systems
    Shayan Firouzi
    Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi
    Davood Mohammad Zamani
    Iraj Ranjber
    Sugar Tech, 2022, 24 : 1851 - 1866
  • [9] An analysis of energy use and economic and environmental impacts in conventional tunnel and LED-equipped vertical systems in healing and acclimatization of grafted watermelon seedlings
    Moosavi-Nezhad, Moein
    Salehi, Reza
    Aliniaeifard, Sasan
    Winans, Kiara S.
    Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 361
  • [10] Analysis of Energy Use Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Lemon (Citrus lemon L.) Production in Turkey
    Ozbek, Osman
    Dokumaci, Keziban Yalcin
    Gokdogan, Osman
    ERWERBS-OBSTBAU, 2023, 65 (05): : 1705 - 1712