Value-Based Indication-Specific Pricing and Weighted-Average Pricing: Estimated Price and Cost Savings for Cancer Drugs

被引:1
作者
Michaeli, Daniel Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Michaeli, Thomas [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Natl Ctr Tumor Dis, Dept Med Oncol, Neuenheimer Feld 460, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Wuppertal, Schumpeter Sch Business & Econ, Wuppertal, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Hosp Mannheim, Dept Personalized Oncol, Mannheim, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, DKFZ, Hector Canc Inst, Mannheim, Germany
[5] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Personalized Med Oncol, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
BENEFIT; PHARMACEUTICALS; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-024-01448-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
ObjectivesFor US Medicare and Medicaid, single drug prices do not reflect the value of supplemental indications. Value-based indication-specific and weighted-average pricing has been suggested for drugs with multiple indications. Under indication-specific pricing, a distinct price is assigned to the differential value a drug offers in each indication. Under weighted-average pricing, a single drug price is calculated that reflects the value and/or volume of each indication. This study estimates price reductions and cost savings for cancer drugs under value-based indication-specific pricing and weighted-average pricing.MethodsWe collected data on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved cancer drugs and indications (2003-2020) from FDA labels, the Global Burden of Disease study, clinicaltrials.gov, and Medicare and Medicaid. A multivariable regression analysis, informed by characteristics of original indications, was used to predict value-based indication-specific prices for supplemental indications. These indication-specific prices were combined with each indication's prevalence data to estimate value-based weighted-average prices and potential cost savings under each policy.ResultsWe identified 123 cancer drugs with 308 indications. Medicare and Medicaid spent a total of $28.2 billion on these drugs in 2020. Adopting value-based indication-specific pricing would increase drug prices by an average of 3.9%, with cost savings of $3.0 billion (10.6%). However, 43.7% higher prices for ultra-rare diseases would increase spending by 16.8% ($44 million). Adopting value-based weighted-average pricing would reduce prices by an average of 4.6% and spending by $3.0 billion (10.6%). Under weighted-average pricing, prices for and spending on ultra-rare diseases would be reduced by 22.6% and $55 million, respectively.ConclusionsValue-based indication-specific and weighted-average pricing could help to align the value and price of new indications, thereby reducing expenditure on drugs with multiple indications.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 427
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Bach P., 2022, Drug Abacus Methods
[2]   Indication-Specific Pricing for Cancer Drugs [J].
Bach, Peter B. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (16) :1629-1630
[3]   Limits on Medicare's Ability to Control Rising Spending on Cancer Drugs [J].
Bach, Peter B. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (06) :626-633
[4]   Price Models for Multi-indication Drugs: A Systematic Review [J].
Campillo-Artero, Carlos ;
Puig-Junoy, Jaume ;
Segu-Tolsa, Jose Luis ;
Trapero-Bertran, Marta .
APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2020, 18 (01) :47-56
[5]   The Economics of Indication-Based Drug Pricing [J].
Chandra, Amitabh ;
Garthwaite, Craig .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (02) :103-106
[6]   Spending For Orphan Indications Among Top-Selling Orphan Drugs Approved To Treat Common Diseases [J].
Chua, Kao-Ping ;
Kimmel, Lauren E. ;
Conti, Rena M. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2021, 40 (03) :453-460
[7]   Delivery of meaningful cancer care: a retrospective cohort study assessing cost and benefit with the ASCO and ESMO frameworks [J].
Del Paggio, Joseph C. ;
Sullivan, Richard ;
Schrag, Deborah ;
Hopman, Wilma M. ;
Azariah, Biju ;
Pramesh, C. S. ;
Tannock, Ian F. ;
Booth, Christopher M. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (07) :887-894
[8]  
Doshi JA, 2016, AM J MANAG CARE, V22, pS78
[9]  
Doshi JA, 2016, AM J MANAG CARE, V22, P188
[10]  
Flume Mathias, 2016, J Mark Access Health Policy, V4, DOI [10.3402/jmahp.v4.30970, 10.3402/jmahp.v4.30970]