A Comparison Study of Hybrid Energy Storage System Topologies for Electric Vehicles

被引:1
作者
Al Takrouri, Mohammad [1 ]
Ayob, Shahrin Bin Md [1 ]
Idris, Nik Rumzi Nik [1 ]
Aziz, Mohd Junaidi Abdul [1 ]
Ayop, Razman [1 ]
Ghith, Ehab Saif [2 ]
Tlija, Mehdi [3 ]
Majeed, Afraz Hussain [4 ]
Arfeen, Zeeshan Ahmad [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Elect Engn, Johor Baharu 81310, Malaysia
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mechatron, Cairo 11566, Egypt
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[4] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[5] Islamia Univ Bahawalpur IUB, Dept Elect Engn, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
关键词
Topology; Batteries; Motors; Voltage control; Energy management; Supercapacitors; Inverters; DC-DC power converters; Bridge circuits; Resistance; Energy storage; Electric vehicles; Supercapacitor; hybrid energy storage system topologies; electric vehicles; STRATEGIES; VOLTAGE;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3476513
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study presents a comprehensive comparison of battery-only, passive, and semi-active hybrid energy storage system (HESS) topologies for electric vehicle (EV) applications. Despite numerous studies on HESS topologies for EVs, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal topology, with limited attempts to address this gap through comprehensive comparisons. Previous research has focused on comparing different semi-active topologies through simulations, neglecting passive approaches and employing best-case scenarios for the energy management system (EMS), disregarding widely used rule-based power follower strategies. The present study aims to address the research gap by conducting a comprehensive comparison of battery-only, passive, and semi-active topologies for a realistic EV application case, focusing on their ability to enhance DC bus voltage stability, RMS battery current, and maximum battery current. The performance of these topologies is evaluated through simulations and experimental validation, with the system under investigation based on the parameters of an electrically converted vehicle. Results show that while the passive HESS topology delivers excellent RMS battery current performance, comparable to the semi-active SC/battery system, it falls short in reducing the maximum battery peak current where the semi-active topologies excel. Additionally, both passive and semi-active SC/battery topologies significantly improve the standard deviation and variation of the DC bus voltage. This study highlights the importance of topology selection in reducing battery degradation in EVs, contributing to the understanding of topology-dependent characteristics, power flow control, discharge rates of the battery pack, and DC bus voltage stability in HESS for EVs.
引用
收藏
页码:171675 / 171688
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Lithium-ion battery and supercapacitor-based hybrid energy storage system for electric vehicle applications: A review [J].
Ahsan, Muhammad Bin Fayyaz ;
Mekhilef, Saad ;
Soon, Tey Kok ;
Mubin, Marizan Binti ;
Shrivastava, Prashant ;
Seyedmahmoudian, Mehdi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (14) :19826-19854
[2]   Power-Electronics-Based Solutions for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Energy Storage and Management Systems [J].
Amjadi, Zahra ;
Williamson, Sheldon S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2010, 57 (02) :608-616
[3]  
Andrea D., 2010, Battery Management Systems for Large Lithium-ion Battery Packs
[4]   A Comprehensive Review of Hybrid Energy Storage Systems: Converter Topologies, Control Strategies and Future Prospects [J].
Babu, Thanikanti Sudhakar ;
Vasudevan, Krishnakumar R. ;
Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna K. ;
Sani, Suleiman Bala ;
Chemud, Sansubari ;
Lajim, Rosli Mat .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :148702-148721
[5]   PFC Cuk Converter-Fed BLDC Motor Drive [J].
Bist, Vashist ;
Singh, Bhim .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2015, 30 (02) :871-887
[6]   Optimizing for Efficiency or Battery Life in a Battery/Supercapacitor Electric Vehicle [J].
Carter, Rebecca ;
Cruden, Andrew ;
Hall, Peter J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 61 (04) :1526-1533
[7]   Capacitance recovery analysis and modelling of supercapacitors during cycling ageing tests [J].
Chaari, R. ;
Briat, O. ;
Vinassa, J. -M. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 82 :37-45
[8]   State-of-charge determination from EMF voltage estimation: Using impedance, terminal voltage, and current for lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries [J].
Coleman, Martin ;
Lee, Chi Kwan ;
Zhu, Chunbo ;
Hurley, William Gerard .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2007, 54 (05) :2550-2557
[9]   Learning policies for battery usage optimization in electric vehicles [J].
Ermon, Stefano ;
Xue, Yexiang ;
Gomes, Carla ;
Selman, Bart .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2013, 92 (01) :177-194
[10]   Comparison of three topologies and controls of a hybrid energy storage system for microgrids [J].
Etxeberria, A. ;
Vechiu, I. ;
Camblong, H. ;
Vinassa, J. -M. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 54 (01) :113-121