Study on the Regulation of Criminal Procedure System in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

被引：0

作者：

Sun Y. ^{[1
]}

Zhang P. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of Law, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing

来源：

Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences | 2024年 / 9卷 / 01期

关键词：

Artificial intelligence; Behavioral game evolution; Hand's formula; Legal Regulation; Rabin Theory;

D O I：

10.2478/amns-2024-0263

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The development of artificial intelligence technology has promoted economic development and improved people's living standards, but it will also cause many risks and uncertainties. The purpose of this paper is to create a reciprocal fairness model for artificial intelligence collaboration and explore the causal relationship and liability allocation in artificial intelligence criminal infringement cases based on Rabin's theory. Through the Hande formula, the criteria for determining fault in the case, as well as the marginal costs and benefits of the aggressor's use of AI to commit crimes, are calculated. Finally, based on the theory of behavioral game evolution, this paper discusses the cooperation law of the three parties under the regulation of the Criminal Procedure Law, and discusses the illegal cost of the illegal implementation of artificial intelligence from the amount of compensation. The results show that in 68,535 cases of using AI to commit crimes in 2022, the average compensation is 74,556.87 yuan, indicating that the cost of crime is much lower than the proceeds of crime. The proposed legal regulations and the prevention and control of AI technology risks can be practiced through this study's practical relevance. © 2024 Yi Sun et al.;published by Sciendo.

引用

共 14 条

[1]

Kowalczewska K., Pzik A., Conference report: New technologies and ai - Legal and practical aspects of the ecosystem of confidence, 16-17 october 2020, poland (online), International Review of Law Computers & Technology, pp. 1-9, (2021)

[2]

Patricia P.P., Helen B.B., Artificial intelligence and data protection: A comparative analysis of ai regulation through the lens of data protection in the eu and brazil, GRUR International, 10, (2022)

[3]

Chatterjee S., Sreenivasulu N., Impact of ai regulation and governance on online personal data sharing: From sociolegal, technology and policy perspective, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, (2021)

[4]

Antonov V.V., Kharisova Z.I., Kalimullin N.R., Abdulnagimov A.I., Modeling problems legal regulation of the field of artificial intelligence, IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 1069, 1, (2021)

[5]

Yara O., Brazheyev A., Golovko L., Bashkatova V., Legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence: Problems and development prospects, European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10, 1, (2021)

[6]

Yu A., Analysis of a legal regulation approach and strategy of a sharing economy based on technological change and sustainable development, Sustainability, (2023)

[7]

Ranchordas S., Experimental regulations for ai: Sandboxes for morals and mores, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2, (2021)

[8]

Drake A., Keller P., Pietropaoli I., Puri A., Maniatis S., Tomlinson J., Et al., Legal contestation of artificial intelligence-related decision-making in the united kingdom: Reflections for policy, International Review of Law Computers & Technology, (2022)

[9]

Durham G., Chisek J., Text to image ai generators: Familiar legal questions about this novel and fast-growing technology, The Computer & Internet Lawyer, (2023)

[10]

Ilyassova G., Nukusheva A., Arenova L., Karzhassova G., Akimzhanova M., Correction to: Prospects of legal regulation in the field of electronic waste management in the context of a circular economy, Springer Netherlands, 3, (2021)

← 1 2 →