Stability analysis of overlying rock mass of lined rock caverns for compressed air energy storage

被引:0
|
作者
Yi, Qi [1 ]
Sun, Guan-hua [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Yuan-feng [3 ]
Gui, Ben [4 ]
Shang, Hao-liang [5 ]
Ji, Wen-dong [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Rock & Soil Mech, State Key Lab Geomechan & Geotech Engn, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Cent Southern China Elect Power Design Inst Co Ltd, China Power Engn Consulting Grp, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Three Gorges Intelligent Engn Co Ltd, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] China Energy Digital Technol Grp Co Ltd, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
关键词
compressed air energy storage (CAES); lined rock caverns (LCR); ultimate equilibrium method; stability; factor of safety; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0953
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Lined rock caverns (LRC) constitute a primary approach for constructing compressed air energy storage (CAES) power plants. Their mechanical capacity to withstand high internal pressures makes the stability of the overlying rock mass a crucial consideration in engineering design. For tunnel-type chambers, we establish a mechanical model of passive rock and soil pressure under the limit stress state of the overlying rock mass, based on the Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) strength criterion and the limit equilibrium concept. Stress boundary integration is applied to derive a system of three-moment equilibrium equations, and a rigorous method for calculating the safety factor of arbitrarily shaped failure surfaces is introduced. Parameter sensitivity analysis reveals that the safety factor is primarily influenced by burial depth, geostress coefficient, maximum air storage pressure, and chamber radius. The safety factor exhibits a nonlinear positive correlation with burial depth and a nonlinear negative correlation with both air storage pressure and chamber radius. For grade III rock mass, the permissible ranges of design parameters, such as burial depth, chamber radius, and maximum air storage pressure, that meet stability requirements are provided, offering valuable guidance for engineering design.
引用
收藏
页码:3523 / 3532
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] BRANDSHAUG T, 2001, Technical review of the lined rock cavern concept and design methodology: mechanical response of rock mass
  • [2] CAI Xiao-hong, 2004, Stress calculations of hydraulic pressure tunnels
  • [3] CaCl2•6H2O/Expanded graphite composite as form-stable phase change materials for thermal energy storage
    Duan, Zhi-jun
    Zhang, Huan-zhi
    Sun, Li-xian
    Cao, Zhong
    Xu, Fen
    Zou, Yong-jin
    Chu, Hai-liang
    Qiu, Shu-jun
    Xiang, Cui-li
    Zhou, Huai-ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2014, 115 (01) : 111 - 117
  • [4] ULTIMATE PULLOUT RESISTANCE OF SINGLE VERTICAL ANCHORS
    GHALY, A
    HANNA, A
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 31 (05) : 661 - 672
  • [5] Japan Gas Association, 2008, DEV ADV NAT GAS STOR, P3
  • [6] Jiang Z., 2019, South. Energy Constr, V6, P6
  • [7] JIN Wei-ping, 2017, Underground gas storage cavern location method for compress air energy storage engineering in hard rock areaJ. Power and Energy, V38, P63
  • [8] Parametric sensitivity analysis of ground uplift above pressurized underground rock caverns
    Kim, Hyung-Mok
    Park, Dohyun
    Ryu, Dong-Woo
    Song, Won-Kyong
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2012, 135 : 60 - 65
  • [9] CRITICAL PRESSURE FOR GAS-STORAGE IN UNLINED ROCK CAVERNS
    LIANG, JH
    LINDBLOM, U
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES & GEOMECHANICS ABSTRACTS, 1994, 31 (04) : 377 - 381
  • [10] LITTLEJOHN G, 1975, Ground engineering, V8, P25