Measuring design mindset: developing the Design Mindset Inventory through its relationship with ambiguity tolerance, self-efficacy and sensation-seeking

被引:0
作者
Lavrsen, Jakob Clemen [1 ]
Carbon, Claus-Christian [2 ]
Daalhuizen, Jaap [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Dept Technol Management & Econ, Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Univ Bamberg, Dept Gen Psychol & Methodol, Bamberg, Germany
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Ind Design Engn, Delft, Netherlands
来源
DESIGN SCIENCE | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
Design mindset; Psychometrics; Psychology; Personality trait; Self-efficacy; Ambiguity tolerance; Sensation-seeking; INTOLERANCE; THINKING;
D O I
10.1017/dsj.2024.36
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Designers rely on many methods and strategies to create innovative designs. However, design research often overlooks the personality and attitudinal factors influencing method utility and effectiveness. This article defines and operationalizes the construct design mindset and introduces the Design Mindset Inventory (D-Mindset0.1), allowing us to measure and leverage statistical analyses to advance our understanding of its role in design. The inventory's validity and reliability are evaluated by analyzing a large sample of engineering students (N = 473). Using factor analysis, we identified four underlying factors of D-Mindset0.1 related to the theoretical concepts: Conversation with the Situation, Iteration, Co-Evolution of Problem-Solution and Imagination. The latter part of the article finds statistical and theoretically meaningful relationships between design mindset and the three design-related constructs of sensation-seeking, self-efficacy and ambiguity tolerance. Ambiguity tolerance and self-efficacy emerge as positively correlated with design mindset. Sensation-seeking, which is only significantly correlated with subconstructs of D-Mindset0.1, is both negatively and positively correlated. These relationships lend validity D-Mindset0.1 and, by drawing on previously established relationships between the three personality traits and specific behaviors, facilitate further investigations of what its subconstructs capture.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Abell N., Springer D.W., Kamata A., Developing and Validating Rapid Assessment Instruments, (2009)
  • [2] Andreasen M.M., Lindemann U., Improving design methods' usability by a mindset approach, Human Behaviour in Design: Individuals, Teams, Tools, pp. 209-218, (2003)
  • [3] Andreasen M.M., Hansen C.T., Cash P., Conceptual Design. Interpretations, Mindset and Models, Conceptual Design: Interpretations, Mindset and Models, (2015)
  • [4] Ball L.J., Christensen B.T., Advancing an understanding of design cognition and design metacognition: Progress and prospects, Design Studies, 65, pp. 35-59, (2019)
  • [5] Bandura A., Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, 2, pp. 191-215, (1977)
  • [6] Bandura A., Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, (1997)
  • [7] Bartlett M.S., A note on the multiplying factors for various χ2 approximations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 16, 2, pp. 296-298, (1954)
  • [8] Beghetto R.A., Personality: Creative Self-Efficacy, Encyclopedia of Creativity, pp. 322-327, (2020)
  • [9] Blizzard J., Klotz L., Potvin G., Hazari Z., Cribbs J., Godwin A., Using survey questions to identify and learn more about those who exhibit design thinking traits, Design Studies, 38, pp. 92-110, (2015)
  • [10] Buchanan A., Mindset Types: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, (2024)