RNA-protein interaction prediction without high-throughput data: An overview and benchmark of in silico tools

被引:0
|
作者
Krautwurst, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Lamkiewicz, Kevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, RNA Bioinformat & High Throughput Anal, Leutragraben 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] European Virus Bioinformat Ctr, Leutragraben 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[3] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Puschstr 4, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
RNA-protein interactions; RNA-protein interaction prediction; Deep learning; In silico RPI prediction; CLIP-Seq; EBOLA-VIRUS VP30; BINDING PROTEINS; INDUCED FIT; WEB SERVER; STRUCTURAL FEATURES; WIDE IDENTIFICATION; SEQUENCE; SPECIFICITY; SITES; CLIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.csbj.2024.11.015
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
RNA-protein interactions (RPIs) are crucial for accurately operating various processes in and between organisms across kingdoms of life. Mutual detection of RPI partner molecules depends on distinct sequential, structural, or thermodynamic features, which can be determined via experimental and bioinformatic methods. Still, the underlying molecular mechanisms of many RPIs are poorly understood. It is further hypothesized that many RPIs are not even described yet. Computational RPI prediction is continuously challenged by the lack of data and detailed research of very specific examples. With the discovery of novel RPI complexes in all kingdoms of life, adaptations of existing RPI prediction methods are necessary. Continuously improving computational RPI prediction is key in advancing the understanding of RPIs in detail and supplementing experimental RPI determination. The growing amount of data covering more species and detailed mechanisms support the accuracy of prediction tools, which in turn support specific experimental research on RPIs. Here, we give an overview of RPI prediction tools that do not use high-throughput data as the user's input. We review the tools according to their input, usability, and output. We then apply the tools to known RPI examples across different kingdoms of life. Our comparison shows that the investigated prediction tools do not favor a certain species and equip the user with results varying in degree of information, from an overall RPI score to detailed interacting residues. Furthermore, we provide a guide tree to assist users which RPI prediction tool is appropriate for their available input data and desired output.
引用
收藏
页码:4036 / 4046
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High throughput approaches to study RNA-protein interactions in vitro
    Ye, Xuan
    Jankowsky, Eckhard
    METHODS, 2020, 178 : 3 - 10
  • [22] Tools for mapping high-throughput sequencing data
    Fonseca, Nuno A.
    Rung, Johan
    Brazma, Alvis
    Marioni, John C.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 28 (24) : 3169 - 3177
  • [23] Two high-throughput screening assays for aberrant RNA-protein interactions in myotonic dystrophy type 1
    Chen, Catherine Z.
    Sobczak, Krzysztof
    Hoskins, Jason
    Southall, Noel
    Marugan, Juan J.
    Zheng, Wei
    Thornton, Charles A.
    Austin, Christopher P.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 402 (05) : 1889 - 1898
  • [24] rpiCOOL: A tool for In Silico RNA-protein interaction detection using random forest
    Akbaripour-Elahabad, Mohammad
    Zahiri, Javad
    Rafeh, Reza
    Eslami, Morteza
    Azari, Mahboobeh
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 402 : 1 - 8
  • [25] High-Throughput Self-Interaction Chromatography: Applications in Protein Formulation Prediction
    Johnson, David H.
    Parupudi, Arun
    Wilson, W. William
    DeLucas, Lawrence J.
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 26 (02) : 296 - 305
  • [26] High-Throughput Self-Interaction Chromatography: Applications in Protein Formulation Prediction
    David H. Johnson
    Arun Parupudi
    W. William Wilson
    Lawrence J. DeLucas
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2009, 26
  • [27] Mapping specificity landscapes of RNA-protein interactions by high throughput sequencing
    Jankowsky, Eckhard
    Harris, Michael E.
    METHODS, 2017, 118 : 111 - 118
  • [28] Comparison of high-throughput sequencing data compression tools
    Numanagic, Ibrahim
    Bonfield, James K.
    Hach, Faraz
    Voges, Jan
    Ostermann, Joern
    Alberti, Claudio
    Mattavelli, Marco
    Sahinalp, S. Cenk
    NATURE METHODS, 2016, 13 (12) : 1005 - +
  • [29] Comparison of high-throughput sequencing data compression tools
    Ibrahim Numanagić
    James K Bonfield
    Faraz Hach
    Jan Voges
    Jörn Ostermann
    Claudio Alberti
    Marco Mattavelli
    S Cenk Sahinalp
    Nature Methods, 2016, 13 : 1005 - 1008
  • [30] A comprehensive benchmark of RNA-RNA interaction prediction tools for all domains of life
    Umu, Sinan Ugur
    Gardner, Paul P.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 33 (07) : 988 - 996