Tactile Feedback in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review

被引:1
作者
Colan, Jacinto [1 ]
Davila, Ana [2 ]
Hasegawa, Yasuhisa [2 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Dept Micronano Mech Sci & Engn, Nagoya, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Inst Innovat Future Soc, Nagoya, Japan
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
haptic interface; minimally invasive surgery; robotic assisted surgery; tactile feedback; HAPTIC FEEDBACK; FLEXIBLE NEEDLES; FORCE; TELEOPERATION; DEFORMATION; PALPATION; FINGER;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.70019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundRobot-assisted systems have predominantly relied on teleoperation, where visual feedback is the primary source of information. However, advances in tactile sensing and displays offer new opportunities to enhance surgical transparency, efficiency, and safety.MethodsA PRISMA-guided search was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies.ResultsOut of 645 screened articles, 98 met the inclusion criteria, and 33 were included in the final review. The review discusses various tactile feedback stimulus types, applications, and challenges in the context of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.ConclusionWhile kinaesthetic feedback has been extensively explored to restore the natural interaction between the surgeon and the surgical environment, tactile feedback remains largely confined to research settings. This is due to significant challenges in integrating tactile feedback into robotic systems and current limitations of sensing technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Multielement Tactile Feedback System for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    King, Chih-Hung
    Culjat, Martin O.
    Franco, Miguel L.
    Bisley, James W.
    Carman, Gregory P.
    Dutson, Erik P.
    Grundfest, Warren S.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2009, 2 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [2] Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery
    Okamura, Allison M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2009, 19 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [3] Intra-operative tumour localisation in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: A review
    Li, Min
    Liu, Hongbin
    Jiang, Allen
    Seneviratne, Lakmal D.
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Althoefer, Kaspar
    Wurdemann, Helge
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2014, 228 (05) : 509 - 522
  • [4] Role of combined tactile and kinesthetic feedback in minimally invasive surgery
    Lim, Soo-Chul
    Lee, Hyung-Kew
    Park, Joonah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2015, 11 (03) : 360 - 374
  • [5] Haptics for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Okamura, A. M.
    Verner, L. N.
    Reiley, C. E.
    Mahvash, M.
    ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2010, 66 : 361 - 372
  • [6] A resonant tactile stiffness sensor for lump localization in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery
    Yun, Yahui
    Wang, Yaming
    Guo, Hao
    Wang, Yaoyao
    Wu, Hongtao
    Chen, Bai
    Ju, Feng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2019, 233 (09) : 909 - 920
  • [7] Tactile Feedback Induces Reduced Grasping Force in Robot-Assisted Surgery
    King, Chih-Hung
    Culjat, Martin O.
    Franco, Miguel L.
    Lewis, Catherine E.
    Dutson, Erik P.
    Grundfest, Warren S.
    Bisley, James W.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2009, 2 (02) : 103 - 110
  • [8] Toward Teaching by Demonstration for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Su, Hang
    Mariani, Andrea
    Ovur, Salih Ertug
    Menciassi, Arianna
    Ferrigno, Giancarlo
    De Momi, Elena
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 18 (02) : 484 - 494
  • [9] Methods and mechanisms for contact feedback in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment
    M. Tavakoli
    A. Aziminejad
    R. V. Patel
    M. Moallem
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2006, 20 : 1570 - 1579
  • [10] Depth Cues in Augmented Reality for Training of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Christensen, Nicklas H.
    Hjermitslev, Oliver G.
    Falk, Frederik
    Madsen, Marco B.
    Ostergaard, Frederik H.
    Kibsgaard, Martin
    Kraus, Martin
    Poulsen, Johan
    Petersson, Jane
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC MINDTREK CONFERENCE (ACADEMIC MINDTREK), 2017, : 120 - 126