Can green hydrogen drive economic transformation in Saudi Arabia? - An input-output analysis of different Power-to-X configurations

被引:0
作者
Mueller, Viktor Paul [1 ,2 ]
Besler, Malte [1 ,3 ]
van Vuuren, Detlef [2 ,4 ]
Eichhammer, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res ISI, Breslauer Str 48, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Tech Univ Bergakad Freiberg, Schlosspl 1, D-09599 Freiberg, Germany
[4] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, Bezuidenhoutseweg 30, NL-2594 AV The Hague, Netherlands
[5] Inst European Energy & Climate Policy IEECP, NL-1043 GR Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Renewable energy; Electrolysis; Ammonia; Value added; Employment; Renewables pull; Resource curse; RENEWABLE ENERGY; RESOURCE CURSE; EMPLOYMENT; EFFICIENCY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100798
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Global demand for fossil fuels is projected to decline by up to 75 percent by 2050, requiring new economic strategies for fossil exporters to promote diversification. This study employs an inter-country input-output model to assess sector interdependence in Saudi Arabia and explore the macroeconomic impacts of investing in Powerto-X (PtX) plants. We analyze four configurations: pure solar and hybrid solar-wind systems, producing either green hydrogen or ammonia. Our comparative analysis shows that hybrid plants appear to have stronger domestic effects than pure solar configurations, while producing green ammonia instead of hydrogen generates stronger relative employment. These trends remain consistent across different sensitivities and domestic supply shares. However, the differences between configurations and sensitivities decrease with increasing domestic supply. Currently Saudi Arabia has limited developed manufacturing sectors and the economy is heavily dependent on exports of crude oil and related products-a situation often referred to as the "resource curse". For all PtX configurations, the construction sector therefore emerges as the largest contributor to domestic employment and value added. At current import shares, foreign effects, particularly in China and the United States, account for about half of the total impact, especially in sectors such as electronics and machinery. Without embedding the hydrogen supply chain into their industrial landscape by starting to produce parts of clean technologies locally, exporters risk substantial value creation occurring predominantly abroad. Overall, our research highlights the need for targeted policy measures to capitalize on the ,,renewables pull effect" when installing PtX plants for green energy exports.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Modeling green hydrogen production using power-to-x: Saudi and German contexts
    Alhadhrami, Khalid
    Albalawi, Ahmed
    Hasan, Shahid
    Elshurafa, Amro M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 64 : 1040 - 1051
  • [2] Economic effects of the hydrogen fuel cell sector in South Korea: An input-output analysis
    Kim, Bum -Jo
    Hyun, Min-Ki
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 68 : 955 - 969
  • [3] Macroeconomic analysis of a new green hydrogen industry using Input-Output analysis: The case of Switzerland
    Gupta, Ruchi
    Guibentif, Thomas M. M.
    Friedl, Markus
    Parra, David
    Patel, Martin Kumar
    ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 183
  • [4] Environmental and Socio-Economic Analysis of Naphtha Reforming Hydrogen Energy Using Input-Output Tables: A Case Study from Japan
    Hienuki, Shunichi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08): : 1376
  • [5] A comparative techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of Power-to-X processes from different energy sources
    Bellotti, D.
    Rivarolo, M.
    Magistri, L.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 260
  • [6] Techno-economic analysis and optimization of solar and wind energy systems for power generation and hydrogen production in Saudi Arabia
    Al-Sharafi, Abdullah
    Sahin, Ahmet Z.
    Ayar, Tahir
    Yilbas, Bekir S.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 69 : 33 - 49