Operationalizing the social capital of collaborative environmental governance with network metrics

被引:1
|
作者
Nesbitt, H. K. [1 ]
Hamilton, M. [2 ]
Ulibarri, N. [3 ]
Williamson, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Human Environm Syst, 1295 W Univ Dr, Boise, ID 83706 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, 2021 Coffey Rd, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urban Planning & Publ Policy, 300 Social Ecol 1, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2024年 / 19卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
collaboration; collaborative; environmental governance; outcomes; social capital; social network analysis; POLICY NETWORKS; COLLECTIVE ACTION; MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; INSTITUTIONS; ADAPTATION; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT; ORGANIZATIONS; COOPERATION;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ad7bd0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social capital is frequently invoked as a reason for engaging in collaborative environmental governance. Yet we have a limited understanding of how collaborative environmental governance mobilizes different types of social capital and how the advantages and costs of social capital accrue for different groups of people. Explicit measures of social capital, such as through social network methods, will help build an understanding of how social capital facilitates collective processes and for whom. We reviewed highly cited articles in Web of Science and Scopus using 'social capital' as the search term to identify foundational and emergent social capital concepts. In the context of collaborative environmental governance, we operationalized these social capital concepts with network measures drawn from our expertise and highlighted existing empirical relationships between such network measures and collaborative outcomes. We identified two different perspectives on social capital-one based on social relations that could be readily operationalized with social network measures and the other based on actor characteristics that can further contextualize network data. Relational social capital concepts included social relations among actors; the collective social setting in which relations are embedded; and the advantages and costs that social capital confers to individuals and the collective. Social capital concepts based on actor characteristics included socio-cognitions (e.g. trust, norms, identification with a group, shared meanings) and community engagement (e.g. group membership, civic participation, volunteerism). Empirical evidence using social network approaches to measure social capital reveals patterns in relationship building that influence collaborative and other sustainability outcomes. Social network approaches described here may help define and quantify the social capital mobilized by collaborative governance. Additional research is necessary to track the social capital of collaboratives over time, link it to outcomes, and better understand the social justice implications of collaborative governance.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Capital structure decisions and environmental, social and governance performance: insights from Jordan
    Al Amosh, Hamzeh
    Khatib, Saleh F. A.
    Alkurdi, Amneh
    Bazhair, Ayman Hassan
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2024, 22 (04) : 972 - 989
  • [32] Synapses in the Network: Learning in Governance Networks in the Context of Environmental Management
    Newig, Jens
    Guenther, Dirk
    Pahl-Wostl, Claudia
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2010, 15 (04):
  • [33] Drivers of (in)equity in collaborative environmental governance
    Dobbin, Kristin Babson
    Kuo, Michael
    Lubell, Mark
    Bostic, Darcy
    Mendoza, Jessica
    Echeveste, Ernest
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2023, 51 (02) : 375 - 395
  • [34] Collaborative Governance and the Challenges of Network-Based Research
    Berardo, Ramiro
    Fischer, Manuel
    Hamilton, Matthew
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 50 (08) : 898 - 913
  • [35] The Virtues of Virtue Social Capital, Network Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Weisband, Edward
    AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2009, 52 (06) : 905 - 918
  • [36] The Evolution of the Collaborative Environmental Governance Network in Guizhou Province, China
    Wang, Zhanjie
    Ma, Yongfeng
    Wang, Shasha
    Luo, Chaoliang
    Wang, Yongjian
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [37] Knowledge Sharing in an Insurance Collaborative Supply Chains Network: A Social Network Perspective
    Leon, Ramona-Diana
    Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Raul
    Gomez-Gasquet, Pedro
    Mula, Josefa
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2024, 26 (03) : 1139 - 1159
  • [38] A systematic scoping review of the collaborative governance of environmental and cultural flows
    Bergbusch, Nathanael T.
    Saunders, Mark D.
    Leonard, Kelsey
    St-Hilaire, Andre
    Gibson, Robert B.
    Jardine, Timothy D.
    Courtenay, Simon C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2025, 33 : 1 - 28
  • [39] Social (-Ecological) Network Analysis in Environmental Governance: Central Publications, Important Concepts, and Areas of Application
    Schwenke, Theresa
    Holzkamper, Eike
    HUMAN ECOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 26 (02) : 103 - 145