Operationalizing the social capital of collaborative environmental governance with network metrics

被引:1
|
作者
Nesbitt, H. K. [1 ]
Hamilton, M. [2 ]
Ulibarri, N. [3 ]
Williamson, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boise State Univ, Human Environm Syst, 1295 W Univ Dr, Boise, ID 83706 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, 2021 Coffey Rd, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urban Planning & Publ Policy, 300 Social Ecol 1, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2024年 / 19卷 / 11期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
collaboration; collaborative; environmental governance; outcomes; social capital; social network analysis; POLICY NETWORKS; COLLECTIVE ACTION; MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; INSTITUTIONS; ADAPTATION; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT; ORGANIZATIONS; COOPERATION;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ad7bd0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social capital is frequently invoked as a reason for engaging in collaborative environmental governance. Yet we have a limited understanding of how collaborative environmental governance mobilizes different types of social capital and how the advantages and costs of social capital accrue for different groups of people. Explicit measures of social capital, such as through social network methods, will help build an understanding of how social capital facilitates collective processes and for whom. We reviewed highly cited articles in Web of Science and Scopus using 'social capital' as the search term to identify foundational and emergent social capital concepts. In the context of collaborative environmental governance, we operationalized these social capital concepts with network measures drawn from our expertise and highlighted existing empirical relationships between such network measures and collaborative outcomes. We identified two different perspectives on social capital-one based on social relations that could be readily operationalized with social network measures and the other based on actor characteristics that can further contextualize network data. Relational social capital concepts included social relations among actors; the collective social setting in which relations are embedded; and the advantages and costs that social capital confers to individuals and the collective. Social capital concepts based on actor characteristics included socio-cognitions (e.g. trust, norms, identification with a group, shared meanings) and community engagement (e.g. group membership, civic participation, volunteerism). Empirical evidence using social network approaches to measure social capital reveals patterns in relationship building that influence collaborative and other sustainability outcomes. Social network approaches described here may help define and quantify the social capital mobilized by collaborative governance. Additional research is necessary to track the social capital of collaboratives over time, link it to outcomes, and better understand the social justice implications of collaborative governance.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: a transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations
    Bodin, Orjan
    Robins, Garry
    McAllister, Ryan R. J.
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    Crona, Beatrice
    Tengo, Maria
    Lubell, Mark
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (01):
  • [22] Social capital, conflict, and adaptive collaborative governance: exploring the dialectic
    McDougall, Cynthia
    Banjade, Mani Ram
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [23] The evolution of collaborative networks: A social network analysis of Chinese environmental protection policy
    Li, Yanwei
    Huang, Jing
    PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2023, 38 (01) : 34 - 57
  • [24] Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements
    Wang, Huanming
    Ran, Bing
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2023, 25 (06) : 1187 - 1211
  • [25] Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland
    Borg, Riikka
    Toikka, Arho
    Primmer, Eeva
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 50 : 90 - 97
  • [26] Groundwater governance and social capital
    Lopez-Gunn, E.
    GEOFORUM, 2012, 43 (06) : 1140 - 1151
  • [27] Stability Governance of E-commerce Supply Chain: Social Capital and Governance Mechanism Design Perspective
    He, Jun
    Liang, Kun
    Wu, Peng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [28] The Role of Intermediate Collaborative Forums in Polycentric Environmental Governance
    Wiechman, Adam
    Alonso Vicario, Sara
    Koebele, Elizabeth A.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2024, 34 (02) : 196 - 210
  • [29] Achieving Social and Ecological Outcomes in Collaborative Environmental Governance: Good Examples from Swedish Moose Management
    Dressel, Sabrina
    Sjolander-Lindqvist, Annelie
    Johansson, Maria
    Ericsson, Goran
    Sandstrom, Camilla
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 21
  • [30] Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning
    Berkes, Fikret
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (07)