Digital servitization strategies and business model innovation: The role of knowledge-intensive business services

被引:0
|
作者
Paiola, Marco [1 ]
Grandinetti, Roberto [1 ]
Kowalkowski, Christian [2 ]
Rapaccini, Mario [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Econ & Management Marco Fanno, Via Santo 33, I-35123 Padua, Italy
[2] Linkoping Univ, CBMI Ctr Business Model Innovat, Dept Management & Engn, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Univ Firenze, Dept Ind Engn, Viale Morgagni 40-44, I-50134 Florence, Italy
关键词
Digital servitization; Business model innovation; Configurational approach; Inter-organizational knowledge-intensive re-; lationships; Knowledge-intensive business services; B2B manufacturing; QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS; INDUSTRY; 4.0; MANUFACTURING FIRMS; PRODUCT; TRANSFORMATION; DIGITIZATION; FRAMEWORK; INTERNET; CONFIGURATIONS; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101846
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Several studies on digital servitization strategies highlight that their implementation is closely associated with some form of business model innovation. In order to engage in these innovation projects, firms need to expand their internal knowledge and skills while leveraging external organizations that support them in their servitization journey. To date, little is known about the intra-organizational factors accounting for the activation of new relationships with such knowledge-intensive service providers. This paper adopts a configurational approach for investigating the role of knowledge-intensive relationships in digital servitization strategies. Findings are founded on a multi-method investigation based on a structured survey and semi-structured interviews to Italian B2B manufacturers. The study contributes to the digital servitization literature showing the conditions that lead firms to develop relationships with different types of external providers of knowledge-intensive services, highlighting the role of firm's size, digital readiness, internal commitment, and specific hiring programs in digital servitization paths.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Subsidiary Knowledge Development in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: A Configuration Approach
    Najafi-Tavani, Zhaleh
    Zaefarian, Ghasem
    Henneberg, Stephan C.
    Naude, Peter
    Giroud, Axele
    Andersson, Ulf
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, 2015, 23 (04) : 22 - 43
  • [22] THE CONCEPTUAL DIMENSION OF KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES (KIBS) AS A KEY FACTOR FOR INNOVATION
    Figueiredo, Ronnie
    Ferreira, Joao
    Marques, Carla
    SISTEMAS & GESTAO, 2015, 10 (01): : 148 - 157
  • [23] Internet of things technologies, digital servitization and business model innovation in BtoB manufacturing firms
    Paiola, Marco
    Gebauer, Heiko
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 89 : 245 - 264
  • [24] The role of dynamic capability on a business model in knowledge-intensive firms
    Bonyadi Naeini, Ali
    Jalilian Ahmadkalaei, Seyedeh Hoda
    KYBERNETES, 2022, 51 (12) : 3449 - 3469
  • [25] KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES AND BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN ROMANIAN CHANGING ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
    Catoiu, Iacob
    Tudor, Liviu
    Bisa, Cristian
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2016, 18 (41) : 40 - 54
  • [26] Interregional exchange of knowledge-intensive business services in Russia
    Kotomina O.V.
    Regional Research of Russia, 2015, 5 (4) : 323 - 331
  • [27] AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES AND PERFORMANCE IN KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES
    Zhang, Cui
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 65 (02): : 457 - 469
  • [28] Enacting international opportunities: The role of organizational learning in knowledge-intensive business services
    Laperrière A.
    Spence M.
    Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2015, 13 (3) : 212 - 241
  • [29] Agglomeration and innovation of knowledge intensive business services
    Kekezi, Orsa
    Klaesson, Johan
    INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2020, 27 (05) : 538 - 561
  • [30] Innovation and productivity in knowledge intensive business services
    Antonio Musolesi
    Jean-Pierre Huiban
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2010, 34 : 63 - 81