Research on Control Method of Electron Accelerator Based on Simulink Simulation

被引:0
作者
Yue, Hongwei [1 ]
Li, Zhongping [2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Youwei [2 ]
Cao, Shuchun [2 ,3 ]
Ren, Jieru [1 ]
Zhang, Zimin [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yongtao [1 ]
机构
[1] MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an
[2] Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou
[3] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
来源
Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu/Atomic Energy Science and Technology | 2025年 / 59卷 / 01期
关键词
electronic accelerator; fuzzy neural network PID algorithm; fuzzy PID algorithm; PID algorithm; Simulink;
D O I
10.7538/yzk.2024.youxian.0195
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Electron accelerators are widely used in material modification, disinfection and sterilization, sewage treatment and other fields. However, in practical applications, the control of electron accelerator beam intensity can’t be adjusted quickly and accurately, which greatly reduces the efficiency and quality of production and processing. This paper aims to solve the problems of nonlinearity, time-varying and instability in the beam control process of electron accelerator. To achieve this, the PID algorithm, fuzzy PID algorithm, and fuzzy neural network PID algorithm were employed. The basic principles of each algorithm were first introduced. Then, a mathematical simulation model for beam current control was constructed based on the processing of experimental data from electron beam emission experiments and the theoretical formulas related to electron accelerator beam emission. The three algorithms were subsequently applied to this mathematical simulation model within MATLAB’s Simulink environment. Finally, simulations were conducted in Simulink, with the desired beam current set to 100 mA and the simulation time to 40 seconds. A 5% step response (5 mA) was introduced at 25 seconds as a disturbance. The performance of each algorithm was then compared and analyzed in terms of stabilization time, overshoot, and post-disturbance recovery time. The results show that compared with the PID algorithm, the performance of the fuzzy PID algorithm and the fuzzy neural network PID algorithm is significantly improved. Specifically, the system stabilization time of the fuzzy PID algorithm is reduced by 59.6%, the overshoot is reduced by 48.9%, and the post-disturbance recovery time is reduced by 64.9%. The fuzzy neural network PID algorithm improves these indicators more significantly, the stabilization time is reduced by 77.9%, the overshoot is reduced by 79.6%, and the post-disturbance recovery time is reduced by 87.1%. Based on these results, it is concluded that the fuzzy PID algorithm and the fuzzy neural network PID algorithm can improve the performance of the electron accelerator beam control in terms of accuracy and stability. In summary, the fuzzy PID algorithm and the fuzzy neural network PID algorithm have obvious advantages over the PID algorithm in the electron accelerator beam control, which significantly shortens the response time, reduces the overshoot, and can recover more quickly after being disturbed. It is especially suitable for industrial application scenarios that require high-precision and high-efficiency beam control. Future research can further optimize these algorithms and integrate them into the actual electron accelerator control system to ensure their robustness and stability under different operating conditions. © 2025 Atomic Energy Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 204
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
CAO Shuchun, ZHANG Zimin, LI Zhongping, Et al., High power low-energy DG-series accelerators for E-beam processing, Nuclear Techniques, 32, 3, pp. 206-209, (2009)
[2]  
KUKSANOV N, GOLUBENKO Y, LAVRUCHIN A, Et al., High power DC electron accelerators of ELV-type for research and industrial application, 2020 7th International Congress on Energy Fluxes and Radiation Effects (EFRE), (2020)
[3]  
MEHNERT R., Review of industrial applications of electron accelerators, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 113, pp. 81-87, (1996)
[4]  
DAI Xiyu, Research on the application of PLC in the control system of electron accelerator, Science & Technology for Development, (2010)
[5]  
(2009)
[6]  
LAFFERTY J M., Boride cathodes, Journal of Applied Physics, 22, 3, pp. 299-309, (1951)
[7]  
JOSEPH S B, DADA E G, ABIDEMI A, Et al., Meta-heuristic algorithms for PID controller parameters tuning: Review, approaches and open problems, Heliyon, 8, 5, (2022)
[8]  
JIN Qi, DENG Zhijie, PID control principle and techniques of parameter tuning, Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology (Natural Science), 22, 5, pp. 91-94, (2008)
[9]  
LI Fengman, The research of controlling arithmetic for figure PID, Journal of Liaoning University (Natural Science Edition), 32, 4, pp. 367-370, (2005)
[10]  
ELTAG K, ASLAMX M S, ULLAH R., Dynamic stability enhancement using fuzzy PID control technology for power system, International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 17, 1, pp. 234-242, (2019)