Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Prosumers Energy Storage Systems in Smart Grids

被引:1
作者
Liaqat, Marriam [1 ]
Adnan, Muhammad [1 ]
Ahmad, Mohaira [2 ]
Iqbal, Muhammad Sajid [1 ]
Ahmad, Faizan [3 ]
Din, Sami Ud [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Comp & Emerging Sci FAST, Dept Elect Engn, Chiniot Faisalabad Campus, Chiniot 38000, Pakistan
[2] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
[3] Namal Univ Mianwali, Dept Elect Engn, Mianwali 42250, Pakistan
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
MCDM; Smart grids; Energy storage; Costs; Analytic hierarchy process; Batteries; Sustainable development; Reliability; Organizations; Operations research; AHP; energy management; multi-criteria methods; PROMETHEE; prosumer; renewable energy; smart grid; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; TECHNOLOGIES; MCDM;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3514698
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Modern power systems encompass multiple prosumers, smart grid technologies, and renewable energy resources (RERs). These prosumer-based smart grids are facing the reliability issues that can be mitigated through the adoption of competitive storage technologies. A range of competitive storage technologies have been developed by scientists. However, the systematic selection of best storage technologies is still one of the main challenging research issues in the current literature. To fill this literature gap, this paper proposes a multi-criteria decision framework for energy storage selection in prosumer-based networks. First, a decision-making hierarchy was developed based on the three main criteria including energy flow management for prosumers, technical features, and sustainability. Under these criteria, various sub-criteria were identified. Second, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem was solved for two cases using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE) methods separately. Third, a hybrid AHP and PROMETHEE method was proposed for the selection of an efficient storage system for prosumers based smart grid. Finally, a comprehensive outlook has been provided for prosumer energy storage evaluation. Findings revealed several implications for more accurate storage evaluation decision making. For instance, sensitivity analysis reveals that the lithium ion battery (LIB) has the first preference in AHP method, and the lead acid battery (LAB) has the first preference in PROMETHEE method. However, the second preference for AHP method was the LAB, and the second preference for PROMETHEE method was the LIB. Hence, separate application AHP and PROMETHEE offered a slightly different ranking. According to the proposed hybrid procedure, LIB was ranked as the first option by both AHP and PROMETHEE methods. As a result, the hybridization of AHP and PROMETHEE methods offered a more robust and unique solution to the storage selection problem as compared to the individual method. Storage evaluation decision making has several implications for prosumer-based power systems. In future, only a few storage alternatives would not meet the needs of the large scale emerging power systems, such as peer-to-peer networks. In this situation, the rapid and accurate ranking of various competitive storage alternatives would be a challenging problem. This study is valuable because it offers a comprehensive and flexible decision making tool for storage evaluation for prosumer-based smart grids. For instance, the proposed model can be evaluated with addition or removal of criteria and storage alternatives under different situations.
引用
收藏
页码:188046 / 188071
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A BIBLIOMETRIC DATA ANALYSIS OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS IN HERITAGE BUILDINGS
    Morkunaite, Zydrune
    Kalibatas, Darius
    Kalibatiene, Diana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (02) : 76 - 99
  • [42] Granularity Approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Making About Hybrid Evaluation Information
    Liu, Shihu
    Yu, Fusheng
    Wang, Patrick S. P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 32 (11)
  • [43] Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach
    Tuzkaya, G.
    Ozgen, A.
    Ozgen, D.
    Tuzkaya, U. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 6 (03) : 477 - 490
  • [44] Multi-criteria decision-making methods for selecting the best energy storage systems in arid regions
    Alhammadi, Hamda
    Alghailani, Meera
    Alkhzaimi, Naema
    Alsuwaidi, Dana
    Mayyas, Ahmad
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2025, 13 : 3575 - 3592
  • [45] An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources
    Celikbilek, Yakup
    Tuysuz, Fatih
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 115 : 1246 - 1258
  • [46] Smart grids, prosumers and energy management within a smart city integrated system
    Savastano, Marco
    Suciu, Marta-Christina
    Gorelova, Irina
    Stativa, Gheorghe-Alexandru
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2020, 14 (01): : 1121 - 1134
  • [47] Socially smart grids? A multi-criteria mapping of diverse stakeholder perspectives on smart energy futures in the United Kingdom
    Hargreaves, Nigel
    Hargreaves, Tom
    Chilvers, Jason
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 90
  • [48] Demcrp-et: decentralized multi-criteria ranked prosumers energy trading using distributed ledger technology
    Devi, N. Nandini
    Thokchom, Surmila
    Srivastava, Gautam
    Jhaveri, Rutvij H.
    Roy, Diptendu Sinha
    [J]. PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 17 (01) : 549 - 565
  • [49] A multi-criteria decision-making framework for the location of photovoltaic power coupling hydrogen storage projects
    Gao, Jianwei
    Men, Huijuan
    Guo, Fengjia
    Liang, Pengcheng
    Fan, Yuejin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2021, 44
  • [50] Composite Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Geopolitical Zones in Nigeria
    Ukoba, Michael O.
    Diemuodeke, Ogheneruona E.
    Alghassab, Mohammed
    Njoku, Henry I.
    Imran, Muhammad
    Khan, Zafar A.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14) : 1 - 29