Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Prosumers Energy Storage Systems in Smart Grids

被引:0
|
作者
Liaqat, Marriam [1 ]
Adnan, Muhammad [1 ]
Ahmad, Mohaira [2 ]
Iqbal, Muhammad Sajid [1 ]
Ahmad, Faizan [3 ]
Din, Sami Ud [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Comp & Emerging Sci FAST, Dept Elect Engn, Chiniot Faisalabad Campus, Chiniot 38000, Pakistan
[2] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
[3] Namal Univ Mianwali, Dept Elect Engn, Mianwali 42250, Pakistan
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
MCDM; Smart grids; Energy storage; Costs; Analytic hierarchy process; Batteries; Sustainable development; Reliability; Organizations; Operations research; AHP; energy management; multi-criteria methods; PROMETHEE; prosumer; renewable energy; smart grid; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; TECHNOLOGIES; MCDM;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3514698
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Modern power systems encompass multiple prosumers, smart grid technologies, and renewable energy resources (RERs). These prosumer-based smart grids are facing the reliability issues that can be mitigated through the adoption of competitive storage technologies. A range of competitive storage technologies have been developed by scientists. However, the systematic selection of best storage technologies is still one of the main challenging research issues in the current literature. To fill this literature gap, this paper proposes a multi-criteria decision framework for energy storage selection in prosumer-based networks. First, a decision-making hierarchy was developed based on the three main criteria including energy flow management for prosumers, technical features, and sustainability. Under these criteria, various sub-criteria were identified. Second, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem was solved for two cases using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE) methods separately. Third, a hybrid AHP and PROMETHEE method was proposed for the selection of an efficient storage system for prosumers based smart grid. Finally, a comprehensive outlook has been provided for prosumer energy storage evaluation. Findings revealed several implications for more accurate storage evaluation decision making. For instance, sensitivity analysis reveals that the lithium ion battery (LIB) has the first preference in AHP method, and the lead acid battery (LAB) has the first preference in PROMETHEE method. However, the second preference for AHP method was the LAB, and the second preference for PROMETHEE method was the LIB. Hence, separate application AHP and PROMETHEE offered a slightly different ranking. According to the proposed hybrid procedure, LIB was ranked as the first option by both AHP and PROMETHEE methods. As a result, the hybridization of AHP and PROMETHEE methods offered a more robust and unique solution to the storage selection problem as compared to the individual method. Storage evaluation decision making has several implications for prosumer-based power systems. In future, only a few storage alternatives would not meet the needs of the large scale emerging power systems, such as peer-to-peer networks. In this situation, the rapid and accurate ranking of various competitive storage alternatives would be a challenging problem. This study is valuable because it offers a comprehensive and flexible decision making tool for storage evaluation for prosumer-based smart grids. For instance, the proposed model can be evaluated with addition or removal of criteria and storage alternatives under different situations.
引用
收藏
页码:188046 / 188071
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems: Integrating Multi-Objective Optimization Into a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework
    Mathaba, Tebello Ntsiki Don Mathaba
    Abo-Al-Ez, Khaled
    ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2025, 7 (01)
  • [2] Review of multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable decentralized hybrid energy systems
    Das, Sayan
    Dutta, Risav
    De, Souvanik
    De, Sudipta
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 202
  • [3] A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications
    Baumann, Manuel
    Weil, Marcel
    Peters, Jens F.
    Chibeles-Martins, Nelson
    Moniz, Antonio B.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 107 : 516 - 534
  • [4] A Biological Approach for Energy Management in Smart Grids and Hybrid Energy Storage Systems
    Delgado-Gomes, Vasco
    Borza, Paul Nicolae
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPTIMIZATION OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT (OPTIM), 2014, : 1082 - 1086
  • [5] Assessing energy storage technology options using a multi-criteria decision analysis-based framework
    Murrant, Daniel
    Radcliffe, Jonathan
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 231 : 788 - 802
  • [6] Multi-criteria evaluation and optimization of a thermal energy storage systems
    Sergeevna, Klunko Nataliya
    Altalbawy, Farag M. A.
    Chammam, Abdeljelil
    Ezhilarasan, G.
    Singh, Abhayveer
    Kuvandikovich, Utanov Bunyod
    Kumar, Raj
    Jain, Bhavik
    Sharif, Anwar
    AIP ADVANCES, 2025, 15 (03)
  • [7] A comprehensive assessment method for alternative energy storage in power grids based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making
    Dong, Jiadu
    He, Run
    Jiang, Jianjian
    Hu, Shizhao
    Xu, Liang
    Wang, Tianlin
    Chen, Shen
    2024 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS, ICEEPS 2024, 2024, : 264 - 270
  • [8] Multi-criteria trust establishment for Internet of Agents in smart grids
    Aref A.
    Tran T.
    Aref, Abdullah (a.m.aref@ieee.org), 2017, IOS Press BV (13) : 287 - 309
  • [9] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Boris Yatsalo
    Vladimir Didenko
    Sergey Gritsyuk
    Terry Sullivan
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 467 - 489
  • [10] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489