EPoW: Energy-Efficient Proof-of-Work

被引:1
作者
Yu, Shasha [1 ]
Qiao, Yanan [1 ]
Bo, Junge [1 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shan [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Normal Univ, Guangxi Key Lab Multisource Informat Min & Secur, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING | 2024年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
Security; Bitcoin; Energy efficiency; Consensus protocol; Proof of Work; Peer-to-peer computing; Costs; Blockchain; bitcoin mining; decentralization; energy-efficiency; incentive mechanism; proof-of-work;
D O I
10.1109/TNSE.2024.3418558
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Proof-of-Work (PoW) is a consensus mechanism widely applied in blockchain applications such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. In PoW, only the first miner solving the PoW puzzle by Hash Collisions wins the reward. Thus, PoW-powered cryptocurrencies have become increasingly energy inefficient due to the fierce competition among the participants. Additionally, PoW can cause centralization in blockchain networks. To address these challenges, this research proposes an incentive mechanism named EPoW. EPoW has been proven to generally benefit the conservation of energy in Bitcoin mining by giving miners no incentive to devote a higher hash rate. Moreover, EPoW is an instrument for decentralization by discouraging the collusion among miners. Then, a dual security verification mechanism is proposed to enhance the security of blockchain networks. Finally, extensive comparative experiments are conducted to validate the effectiveness of EPoW in energy efficiency. The research indicates that EPoW eliminates the miner's incentive to devote a higher hash-rate than all their counterparts, thus relieving the malignant competition and conserving expensive energy. Additionally, EPoW alleviates the problem of centralization caused by mining pools.
引用
收藏
页码:6285 / 6297
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Maximizing proof-of-work decentralization
    Culha, Davut
    INGENIERIA SOLIDARIA, 2024, 20 (01): : 22 - 22
  • [22] RDV: An Alternative To Proof-of-Work And A Real Decentralized Consensus For Blockchain
    Solat, Siamak
    BLOCKSYS'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST BLOCKCHAIN-ENABLED NETWORKED SENSOR SYSTEMS, 2018, : 25 - 32
  • [23] Proof-of-work versus proof-of-stake coins as possible hedges against green and dirty energy
    Kliber, Agata
    Bedowska-Sojka, Barbara
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 138
  • [24] Analysis of the confirmation time in proof-of-work blockchains
    Malakhov, Ivan
    Marin, Andrea
    Rossi, Sabina
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2023, 147 : 275 - 291
  • [25] Difficulty Prediction for Proof-of-Work Based Blockchains
    Zheng, Kaiwen
    Zhang, Shulai
    Ma, Xiaoli
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL PROCESSING ADVANCES IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS (IEEE SPAWC2020), 2020,
  • [26] On the Application of Clique Problem for Proof-of-Work in Cryptocurrencies
    Bag, Samiran
    Ruj, Sushmita
    Sakurai, Kouichi
    INFORMATION SECURITY AND CRYPTOLOGY, INSCRYPT 2015, 2016, 9589 : 260 - 279
  • [27] Partial pre-image attack on Proof-of-Work based blockchains
    Baniata, Hamza
    Kertesz, Attila
    BLOCKCHAIN-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 5 (03):
  • [28] Catfish Effect Between Selfish Miners in Proof-of-Work Based Blockchain
    Ruan N.
    Liu H.-Q.
    Si X.-M.
    Jisuanji Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Computers, 2021, 44 (01): : 177 - 192
  • [29] Improving the performance of the Proof-of-Work Consensus Protocol Using Machine learning
    Safana, Mujistapha Ahmed
    Arafa, Yasmine
    Ma, Jixin
    2020 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BLOCKCHAIN COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS (BCCA), 2020, : 16 - 21
  • [30] AeRChain: An Anonymous and Efficient Redactable Blockchain Scheme Based on Proof-of-Work
    Luo, Bin
    Yang, Changlin
    ENTROPY, 2023, 25 (02)