Exploring network dynamics in scientific innovation: collaboration, knowledge combination, and innovative performance

被引:1
作者
Jia, Yangyang [1 ]
Chen, Hongshu [1 ]
Liu, Jingkang [2 ]
Wang, Xuefeng [1 ]
Guo, Rui [3 ]
Wang, Ximeng [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Postal Savings Bank China, Cyber Finance Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS | 2025年 / 12卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
scientific innovation; complex network; network dynamics; stochastic actor-oriented model; collaboration network; knowledge network; IMPACT; EVOLUTION; EMBEDDEDNESS; GROWTH; FIELD;
D O I
10.3389/fphy.2024.1492731
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The system of scientific innovation can be characterized as a complex, multi-layered network of actors, their products and knowledge elements. Despite the progress that has been made, a more comprehensive understanding of the interactions and dynamics of this multi-layered network remains a significant challenge. This paper constructs a multilayer longitudinal network to abstract institutions, products and ideas of the scientific system, then identifies patterns and elucidates the mechanism through which actor collaboration and their knowledge transmission influence the innovation performance and network dynamics. Aside from fostering a collaborative network of institutions via co-authorship, fine-grained knowledge elements are extracted using KeyBERT from academic papers to build knowledge network layer. Empirical studies demonstrate that actor collaboration and their unique and diverse ideas have a positive impact on the performance of the research products. This paper also presents empirical evidence that the embeddedness of the actors, their ideas and features of their research products influence the network dynamics. This study gains a deeper understanding of the driving factors that impact the interactions and dynamics of the multi-layered scientific networks.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] The Roles of Supply Networks and Board Interlocks in Firms' Technological Entry and Exit: Evidence from the Chinese Automotive Industry
    Aalbers, Rick
    Ma, Rongkang
    [J]. MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2023, 19 (02) : 279 - 315
  • [2] Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks
    Abbasi, Alireza
    Hossain, Liaquat
    Leydesdorff, Loet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (03) : 403 - 412
  • [3] The fourth age of research
    Adams, Jonathan
    [J]. NATURE, 2013, 497 (7451) : 557 - 560
  • [4] Exploring the effect of city-level collaboration and knowledge networks on innovation: Evidence from energy conservation field
    Ba, Zhichao
    Mao, Jin
    Ma, Yaxue
    Liang, Zhentao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2021, 15 (03)
  • [5] Knowledge network centrality, formal rank and research performance: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects
    Badar, Kamal
    Hite, Julie M.
    Ashraf, Naeem
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 105 (03) : 1553 - 1576
  • [6] Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations
    Barabási, AL
    Jeong, H
    Néda, Z
    Ravasz, E
    Schubert, A
    Vicsek, T
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2002, 311 (3-4) : 590 - 614
  • [7] Beltagy I., 2019, arXiv, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1903.10676
  • [8] Forms of Dependence: Comparing SAOMs and ERGMs From Basic Principles
    Block, Per
    Stadtfeld, Christoph
    Snijders, Tom A. B.
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2019, 48 (01) : 202 - 239
  • [9] Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review
    Bornmann, Lutz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (12) : 2415 - 2426
  • [10] The firm's knowledge network and the transfer of advice among corporate inventors-A multilevel network study
    Brennecke, Julia
    Rank, Olaf
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (04) : 768 - 783