Analysis and Improvement of the Risk Assessment System Based on the Risk Priority Number

被引：0
作者：
Samara State Technical University, Samara [1 ]
443100, Russia
机构：
[1] Samara State Technical University, Samara
来源：
Russ. Eng. Res. | / 7卷 / 1026-1029期
关键词：
FMEA; risk; risk assessment; risk management; risk priority number;
D O I：
10.3103/S1068798X24701429
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Abstract: The article considers the risk assessment system based on selecting risk response actions in accordance with the calculated risk priority number. Problems of the application of the RPN method and ideas for overcoming these problems are considered. An approach consistent with the AIAG & VDA FMEA methodology that is capable of eliminating some disadvantages of using the priority risk number method is proposed. © Allerton Press, Inc. 2024. ISSN 1068-798X, Russian Engineering Research, 2024, Vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 1026–1029. Allerton Press, Inc., 2024. Russian Text The Author(s), 2024, published in STIN, 2024, No. 6, pp. 38–41.
引用
收藏
页码：1026 / 1029
页数：3
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Barvinok V.A., Torgashov A.V., Klochkov Y.S., Et al., Improvement of the risk analysis procedure in the quality management system, Vektor Nauki Tol’yattinsk, Gos. Univ., 4, pp. 355-360, (2011)
  • [2] Anes V., Henriques E., Freitas M., A new risk prioritization model for failure mode and effects analysis, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int, 34, pp. 516-528, (2018)
  • [3] Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, FMEA Handbook, (2019)
  • [4] Panyukov D.I., Kozlovskii V.N., Aidarov D.V., FMEA risk analysis on the basis of action priorities, Russ. Eng. Res, 42, pp. 1077-1080, (2022)
1