Constructing ARformer: A deep learning model for the long-term gap-filling of carbon flux data

被引:0
|
作者
Qi, Jiandong [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Peng [1 ]
Zha, Tianshan [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing
[2] Engineering Research Center for Forestry-oriented Intelligent Information Processing of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing
[3] School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing
来源
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2024年 / 40卷 / 24期
关键词
Adapter-Reverseformer; carbon flux; deep learning; long-term gap-filling;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202407071
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) measurement is very critical to understanding carbon flux in ecosystems. But some gaps are still common in data collection, due to the harsh weather or sensor malfunction. Traditional interpolation can struggle with the long-term missing data, leading to inaccuracies in carbon flux analysis. Long-term missing data can also occur in NEE measurements. In this study, the Adapter-Reverseformer (ARformer) model was proposed to enhance the accuracy of NEE gap-filling, especially for extended periods of data loss. A multi-layer perceptron (MLP) was integrated with the Reverseformer module. The longer data gaps were effectively utilized to leverage both environmental data and the temporal patterns in the NEE. A novel system was established to focus on the non-linear relationships between NEE and environmental factors. The time-dependent trend was characterized by NEE data. The obtained model was tested using the FLUXNET 2015 dataset. Half-hourly carbon flux data was collected from 65 sites across 10 types of land use. Five artificial gap scenarios were generated by randomly removing data for continuous periods of 1, 7, 15, 30, and 90 days. The performance of ARformer was compared with marginal distribution sampling (MDS), random forest (RF), and three advanced deep learning models: DLinear, PatchTST, and iTransformer. The results demonstrated that the ARformer model consistently outperformed the baseline, especially when dealing with long-term missing data. Specifically, the performance of RF decreased significantly, when the missing data spanned 90 days, and MDS failed to reasonably estimate the model. In contrast, the ARformer model maintained a high accuracy, with R2 values ranging from 0.762 to 0.913. The root mean square error (RMSE) ranged between 0.668 and 2.724 μmol/(m2·s), the mean absolute error (MAE) ranged from 0.410 to 1.751 μmol/(m2·s), and bias values remained between −0.024 and 0.067 μmol/(m2·s). The ARformer model demonstrated superior performance across different land-use types, including closed shrublands, deciduous broadleaf forests, evergreen broadleaf forests, evergreen needle-leaf forests, and mixed forests. As such, the ARformer model was used to more effectively capture these vegetation types with the complex relationships between NEE and environmental drivers. Furthermore, it was observed that the time-series deep learning models in general provided the better interpolation for the long-term missing NEE data, with ARformer leading in accuracy. In conclusion, deep learning models, particularly the ARformer model, were highly effective in filling the gaps in NEE data for the various ecosystems. The ARformer model was recommended when the data gaps were extended beyond 30 days. The accuracy of interpolation was also attributed to the temporal dependencies and the relationship between NEE and environmental factors. More reliable NEE data was then obtained to clarify the carbon flux dynamics across different ecosystems. Thus, the ARformer model was represented for the long-term data gaps in NEE measurements. © 2024 Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 136
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] BALDOCCHI D., How eddy covariance flux measurements have contributed to our understanding of Global Change Biology, Global Change Biology, 26, 1, pp. 242-260, (2020)
  • [2] SHI Yuanzhi, SHI Hong, CUI Yuanlai, Et al., Variation of water use efficiency in a paddy field in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River using eddy covariance method, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 37, 4, pp. 130-139, (2021)
  • [3] CHU H, LUO X, OUYANG Z, Et al., Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 301, (2021)
  • [4] LUCAS-MOFFAT A, SCHRADER F, HERBST M, Et al., Multiple gap-filling for eddy covariance datasets, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 325, (2022)
  • [5] TENG D, HE X, WANG J, Et al., Uncertainty in gap filling and estimating the annual sum of carbon dioxide exchange for the desert Tugai forest, Ebinur Lake Basin, Northwest China, PeerJ, 8, (2020)
  • [6] ZHU S, MCCALMONT J, CARDENAS M, Et al., Gap-filling carbon dioxide, water, energy, and methane fluxes in challenging ecosystems: Comparing between methods, drivers, and gap-lengths, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 332, (2023)
  • [7] ZHU S, CLEMENT R, MCCALMONT J, Et al., Stable gap-filling for longer eddy covariance data gaps: A globally validated machine-learning approach for carbon dioxide, water, and energy fluxes, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 314, (2022)
  • [8] MAHABBATI A, BERINGER J, LEOPOLD M, Et al., A comparison of gap-filling algorithms for eddy covariance fluxes and their drivers, Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 10, 1, pp. 123-140, (2021)
  • [9] XIAO Q, GENG G, CHENG J, Et al., Evaluation of gap-filling approaches in satellite-based daily PM2. 5 prediction models, Atmospheric Environment, 244, (2021)
  • [10] VEKURI H, TUOVINEN J, KULMALA L, Et al., A widely-used eddy covariance gap-filling method creates systematic bias in carbon balance estimates, Scientific Reports, 13, 1, (2023)