Machine learning models for seismic analysis of buckling-restrained braced frames

被引:3
作者
Anand, T. P. [1 ]
Pandikkadavath, Muhamed Safeer [2 ]
Mangalathu, Sujith [3 ,4 ]
Sahoo, Dipti Ranjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Civil Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol Calicut, Dept Civil Engn, Kozhikode 673601, India
[3] Mangalathu Consultants, Kollam 691507, Kerala, India
[4] Natl Inst Technol Calicut, Vajra Fac, Dept Civil Engn, Kozhikode 673601, India
关键词
Buckling restrained braces; Nonlinear responses history analysis; Inter-storey drift ratio; Residual drift ratio; Machine learning; Accumulated local effect; Shapley additive explanations; LARGE-SCALE; STEEL; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111398
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The current research addresses the need for efficient analysis, design, and post-earthquake damage assessment of buckling-restrained braced frames by developing machine learning (ML) models to predict multiple engineering demand parameters (EDPs) under various seismic loading conditions. To this end, a database of 16,694 records is formulated using numerical simulations. Then, nine supervised ML algorithms are optimised through hyperparameter tuning and validated to identify the most effective prediction model. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated superior performance in estimating the inter-storey drift ratio (IDR), residual drift ratio (RDR), maximum ductility demand (mu max), and cumulative ductility demand (mu cum). Consequently, a user-friendly graphical user interface is devised for its seamless implementation. Finally, interpretable ML techniques, such as Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and accumulated local effects, are applied to the XGBoost model to discern key input parameters and prediction trends. Pseudo-spectral acceleration at 2.0 s is identified as the most influential variable for predicting IDR, RDR, and mu max, while Arias intensity is the most significant for predicting mu cum. The top-ranking earthquake parameters identified through SHAP aid structural designers in assessing optimal intensity measures for fragility analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
[11]   Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces [J].
Black, CJ ;
Makris, N ;
Aiken, ID .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (06) :880-894
[12]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[13]   Seismic Behavior of Steel Buildings with Hybrid Braced Frames [J].
Chao, Shih-Ho ;
Karki, Netra B. ;
Sahoo, Dipti R. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (06) :1019-1032
[14]   Application of low yield strength steel on controlled plastification ductile concentrically braced frames [J].
Chen, CC ;
Chen, SY ;
Liaw, JJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 28 (05) :823-836
[15]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[16]   Predictive modelling for the acid resistance of cement-based composites modified with eggshell and glass waste for sustainable and resilient building materials [J].
Chen, Zhiqiang ;
Amin, Muhammad Nasir ;
Iftikhar, Bawar ;
Ahmad, Waqas ;
Althoey, Fadi ;
Alsharari, Fahad .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 76
[17]  
Chopra AK., 2007, INT SERIES CIVIL ENG
[18]   Artificial intelligence in structural health management of existing bridges [J].
Di Mucci, Vincenzo Mario ;
Cardellicchio, Angelo ;
Ruggieri, Sergio ;
Nettis, Andrea ;
Reno, Vito ;
Uva, Giuseppina .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 167
[19]   Parameterized deep reinforcement learning-enabled maintenance decision-support and life-cycle risk assessment for highway bridge portfolios [J].
Du, Ao ;
Ghavidel, Alireza .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2022, 97
[20]   Metamodel-based state-dependent fragility modeling for Markovian sequential seismic damage assessment [J].
Du, Ao ;
Cai, Jiannan ;
Li, Shuai .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 243