Understanding self-directed learning in AI-Assisted writing: A mixed methods study of postsecondary learners

被引:0
作者
Wang C. [1 ]
Li Z. [2 ]
Bonk C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Writing, Colby College, 5290 Mayflower Hill, Waterville, 04901, ME
[2] Department of Instructional Systems Technology, Indiana University Bloomington, 201 N Rose Ave, Education Building 3022, Bloomington, 47405, IN
来源
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence | 2024年 / 6卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; Motivation; Self-directed learning; Writing;
D O I
10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100247
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study investigates how postsecondary learners employ generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, to support their self-directed learning (SDL) for writing purposes. Following a sequential mixed methods design, we analyzed 384 survey responses and 10 semi-structured interviews with postsecondary writers. Findings suggest that the major learning task that the learners used ChatGPT for writing is brainstorming and seeking inspiration for ideas. While the entering motivation for using ChatGPT varies from curiosity about innovative technologies to fulfilling academic requirements, such entering motivation transformed into task motivation when the learners perceived the potential benefits of ChatGPT for assisting their writing. In terms of self-management, participants mostly demonstrated a high responsibility towards their own learning with ChatGPT and employed various strategies for SDL. Although survey respondents demonstrated a comparatively low level of self-monitoring, most interviewees claimed that they critically reflected on their learning process and validated information provided by ChatGPT. There are mixed opinions regarding whether the writing skills have improved as a result of using ChatGPT. Some participants suggested that the benefits brought by ChatGPT, such as alleviating social pressure and receiving instant feedback at any time, encouraged them to spend more time practicing writing and making revisions. However, some argue that assessing their AI-assisted SDL learning progress in the short term is challenging. This study addresses gaps in the existing literature where there is scarce, large-scale empirical research on self-directed AI usage in writing, shedding light on the emerging phenomenon of utilizing generative AI as a means of SDL in writing. © 2024 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Alexopoulou T., Michel M., Murakami A., Meurers D., Task effects on linguistic complexity and accuracy: A large‐scale learner corpus analysis employing natural language processing techniques, Language Learning, 67, S1, pp. 180-208, (2017)
[2]  
Ali F., Choy D., Divaharan S., Tay H., Chen H., Supporting self-directed learning and self-assessment using TeacherGAIA, a generative AI chatbot application: Learning approaches and prompt engineering, Learning: Research and Practice, 9, 2, pp. 135-147, (2023)
[3]  
Alvi E., Gillies R.M., Social interactions that support students' self-regulated learning: A case study of one teacher's experiences, International Journal of Educational Research, 72, pp. 14-25, (2015)
[4]  
Baker R.S., Hawn A., Algorithmic bias in education, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, pp. 1052-1092, (2022)
[5]  
Bannert M., Sonnenberg C., Mengelkamp C., Pieger E., Short- and long-term effects of students' self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance, Computers in Human Behavior, 52, pp. 293-306, (2015)
[6]  
Barrot J.S., Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials, Assessing Writing, 57, (2023)
[7]  
Creswell J.W., Plano-Clark V.L., Designing and conducting mixed methods research, (2017)
[8]  
Dey I., Qualitative data analysis. A user-friendly guide for social scientists, (1993)
[9]  
Doo M.Y., Zhu M., A meta‐analysis of effects of self‐directed learning in online learning environments, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (2023)
[10]  
Elo S., Kyngas H., The qualitative content analysis process, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 1, pp. 107-115, (2008)