The Gap Between Trustworthy AI Research and Trustworthy Software Research: A Tertiary Study

被引:0
作者
Liu, Bohan [1 ]
Li, Gongyuan [1 ]
Zhang, He [1 ]
Jin, Yuzhe [1 ]
Wang, Zikuan [1 ]
Shao, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Software Inst, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Trustworthy; quality attribute; artificial intelligence; software system; systematic literature review; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE-REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1145/3694964
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
With the increasing application and complexity of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, the trustworthiness of AI has garnered widespread attention across various fields. An AI system is a specific type of software system with unique trustworthiness requirements due to its distinctive characteristics in data and algorithms. Our objective is to investigate the state-of-the-art in trustworthy AI and trustworthy software separately and to analyze the connections and gaps between them. To this end, we conducted a tertiary study, which is a systematic literature review of existing secondary studies. These secondary studies are divided into two groups: one focuses on trustworthy AI and the other on trustworthy software. We developed frameworks for both trustworthy AI and trustworthy software, summarized the definitions of quality attributes in a structured format, and analyzed the similarities of these attributes between the two areas. Additionally, we created a swimlane diagram illustrating trustworthy practices throughout the development life-cycle and in relation to specific quality attributes. Researchers in these two areas originate from distinct research communities, leading to a significant gap between the trustworthiness of AI and software. However, we believe that existing research on trustworthy software can effectively address some gaps in trustworthy AI research, and we have identified evidence of connections between the two areas.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Abran Alain, 2004, IEEE Computer Society, Angela Burgess, V25, P1235
  • [2] Angwin Julia, 2016, ProPublica May 23,
  • [3] Artificial Intelligence Poised to Ride a New Wave
    Anthes, Gary
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2017, 60 (07) : 19 - 21
  • [4] Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing
    Avizienis, A
    Laprie, JC
    Randell, B
    Landwehr, C
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2004, 1 (01) : 11 - 33
  • [5] Becker Steffen, 2006, ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, V31, P1
  • [6] Architecting systems of systems: A tertiary study
    Cadavid, Hector
    Andrikopoulos, Vasilios
    Avgeriou, Paris
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 118
  • [7] A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
    Chamola, Vinay
    Hassija, Vikas
    Sulthana, A. Razia
    Ghosh, Debshishu
    Dhingra, Divyansh
    Sikdar, Biplab
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 78994 - 79015
  • [8] Cornwell M. R., 1989, Proceedings 1989 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No.89CH2703-7), P148, DOI 10.1109/SECPRI.1989.36289
  • [9] Recommended Steps for Thematic Synthesis in Software Engineering
    Cruzes, Daniela S.
    Dyba, Tore
    [J]. 2011 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT (ESEM 2011), 2011, : 275 - 284
  • [10] Usability in agile software development: A tertiary study
    Curcio, Karina
    Santana, Rodolfo
    Reinehr, Sheila
    Malucelli, Andreia
    [J]. COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2019, 64 : 61 - 77