Optimizing the methodology for the assessment of bulbar conjunctival lissamine green staining

被引:2
作者
Ghorbani-Mojarrad, Neema [1 ,2 ]
Vianya-Estopa, Marta [3 ]
Martin, Eilidh [4 ]
Sweeney, Laura E. [4 ]
Terry, Louise [5 ]
Huntjens, Byki [6 ]
Wolffsohn, James S. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bradford, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Bradford, England
[2] Bradford Royal Infirm, Wolfson Ctr Appl Hlth Res, Bradford, England
[3] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Vis & Hearing Sci Res Ctr, Cambridge, England
[4] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Dept Vis Sci, Glasgow, Scotland
[5] Cardiff Univ, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Cardiff, Wales
[6] City Univ London, Dept Optometry & Visual Sci, London, England
[7] Aston Univ, Sch Optometry, Birmingham, England
关键词
EYE; FLUORESCEIN; CORNEAL; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0000000000002173
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
SIGNIFICANCE: When using lissamine green for bulbar conjunctival evaluation, the most staining was observed with two applications of the same strip in the same eye, wetted with a drop of saline. The first application was 5 seconds after wetting the strip, and the second was 1 minute later, followed by immediate viewing. This suggests that bulbar staining should be viewed before the lid wiper region. PURPOSE: This study aimed to optimize the assessment of lissamine green staining of the bulbar conjunctiva by investigating the application technique and subsequent observation period. METHODS: Twenty-two participants with dry eye (as defined by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II) were recruited to trial five application methods in randomized order: (1) application immediately after wetting a single strip, (2) application 5 seconds after wetting a single strip, (3) application 10 seconds after wetting a single strip, (4) consecutive single application of sodium fluorescein followed by lissamine green 5 seconds after wetting, and (5) two applications using the same lissamine green strip 5 seconds after wetting, 1 minute apart. Slit-lamp photography of the conjunctiva was performed immediately following application and at 30, 60, 90, and 300 seconds after application. Three experienced (masked) practitioners independently quantified the visible punctate spots and graded the staining intensity within the images in a random order. RESULTSValues for punctate spot count (F = 6.29, p<0.0001) and lissamine green staining intensity (F = 6.29, p<0.0001) varied significantly between the different application methods. Using two applications of the same lissamine green strip, 1 minute apart, in the same eye resulted in the greatest values for both punctate spot count and lissamine green staining intensity. Lissamine green staining decreased with time for both spot count (F = 18.87, p<0.0001) and lissamine green staining intensity (F = 11.33, p<0.0001), with the most staining found immediately after application followed by a gradual decline. There was no evidence of any interaction effect between time and application method for either measure (p>0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal approach for assessing bulbar conjunctival lissamine green staining involves two applications of a whole infused drop resting on the same strip for 5 seconds, applied 1 minute apart. The ocular surface should be viewed immediately after application to maximize the conjunctival staining observed.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 594
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The effect of time on grading corneal fluorescein and conjunctival lissamine green staining [J].
Begley, Carolyn G. ;
Caffery, Barbara ;
Nelson, J. Daniel ;
Situ, Ping .
OCULAR SURFACE, 2022, 25 :65-70
[2]   Clinical staining of the ocular surface: Mechanisms and interpretations [J].
Bron, A. J. ;
Argueeso, P. ;
Irkec, M. ;
Bright, F. V. .
PROGRESS IN RETINAL AND EYE RESEARCH, 2015, 44 :36-61
[3]   Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests [J].
Bron, AJ ;
Evans, VE ;
Smith, JA .
CORNEA, 2003, 22 (07) :640-650
[4]  
Bron AJ, 2007, OCUL SURF, V5, P108
[5]   Validation of the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5): Discrimination across self-assessed severity and aqueous tear deficient dry eye diagnoses [J].
Chalmers, Robin L. ;
Begley, Carolyn G. ;
Caffery, Barbara .
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2010, 33 (02) :55-60
[6]   TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report [J].
Craig, Jennifer P. ;
Nichols, Kelly K. ;
Akpek, Esen K. ;
Caffery, Barbara ;
Dua, Harminder S. ;
Joo, Choun-Ki ;
Liu, Zuguo ;
Nelson, J. Daniel ;
Nichols, Jason J. ;
Tsubota, Kazuo ;
Stapleton, Fiona .
OCULAR SURFACE, 2017, 15 (03) :276-283
[7]   Comparative performance of lissamine green stains [J].
Delaveris, Androniki ;
Stahl, Ulrike ;
Madigan, Michele ;
Jalbert, Isabelle .
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2018, 41 (01) :23-27
[8]   Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications [J].
Efron, N ;
Morgan, PB ;
Katsara, SS .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2001, 21 (01) :17-29
[9]   Putting vital stains in context [J].
Efron, Nathan .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2013, 96 (04) :400-421
[10]   WHAT IS ACTUALLY STAINED BY ROSE-BENGAL [J].
FEENSTRA, RPG ;
TSENG, SCG .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 110 (07) :984-993