DEALING WITH COMPLEXITY IN DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH: A METHODOLOGY USING DESIGN ECHELONS1

被引:6
作者
Tuunanen T. [1 ]
Winter R. [2 ]
vom Brocke J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä
[2] Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen
[3] European Research Center for Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster
来源
MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems | 2024年 / 48卷 / 02期
关键词
design echelon; design knowledge development; Design science research; echelon-specific validation; methodology; organizing logic; research project complexity;
D O I
10.25300/MISQ/2023/16700
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Design science research (DSR) aims to generate knowledge about innovative solutions to real-world problems. Consequently, DSR needs to deal with the complexity related to problem and solution spaces involving sociotechnical phenomena that people perceive differently and are subject to constant change. This complexity poses challenges to sequential, process-based approaches—specifically, the existing DSR methodology. We designed a DSR methodology that extends existing approaches by adding a complementary organizing logic to address complexity. Based on the theory of hierarchical, multilevel systems, we suggest organizing DSR based on the concept of “echelons”—meaning decomposing DSR projects into smaller logically coherent self-contained parts—and suggest a set of five design echelons that imply a hierarchical organizing logic for DSR projects. The echeloned DSR (eDSR) methodology was developed in five iterations, involving seven design and evaluation episodes. ©2024. The Authors.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 458
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Value Expression in Design Science Research [J].
Weigand, H. .
2019 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN INFORMATION SCIENCE (RCIS), 2019, :171-181
[32]   A Conceptual Framework for Design Science Research [J].
Ostrowski, Lukasz ;
Helfert, Markus ;
Hossain, Fakir .
PERSPECTIVES IN BUSINESS INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2011, 90 :345-354
[33]   Design Science Research: Paradigm or Approach? [J].
Weber, Sven .
AMCIS 2010 PROCEEDINGS, 2010,
[34]   Construction of Design Science Research Questions [J].
Hoang Thuan, Nguyen ;
Drechsler, Andreas ;
Antunes, Pedro .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 44 (01) :332-363
[35]   Insights into Practitioner Design Science Research [J].
Nagle, Tadhg ;
Sammon, David ;
Doyle, Cathal .
DESIGNING THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION, DESRIST 2017, 2017, 10243 :414-428
[36]   A Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Approach for the Design of a Qualitative Methodology in Science Educational Research [J].
Grimalt-Alvaro, Carme ;
Ametller, Jaume .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2021, 20
[37]   A design science research methodology for developing an integrated model supplier reduction and grouping parts using GT-based algorithm [J].
Dehghani, Maryam ;
Akhavan, Peyman ;
Abbasi, Morteza .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2023, 38 (09) :1911-1926
[38]   Development of a Method for the Engineering of Digital Innovation Using Design Science Research [J].
Huseynli, Murad ;
Bub, Udo ;
Ogbuachi, Michael Chima .
INFORMATION, 2022, 13 (12)
[39]   Towards Developing a Framework for Conducting Management Studies Using Design Research Methodology [J].
Ebneyamini, Shiva .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2022, 21
[40]   How to Encourage Inclusion in a Qualitative Research Project Using a Design-Based Research Methodology [J].
Stockless, Alain ;
Briere, Sophie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2024, 23