A machine learning-based method for predicting the shear behaviors of rock joints

被引:0
作者
He, Liu [1 ]
Tan, Yu [2 ]
Copeland, Timothy [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Jiannan [4 ]
Tang, Qiang [5 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Fac Geosci & Engn, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Madison, WI USA
[3] Geosyntec Consultants Inc, Orlando, FL USA
[4] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, Orlando, FL USA
[5] Soochow Univ, Sch Rail Transportat, Yangchenghu Campus, Suzhou 215131, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rock joint; Machine learning prediction models; Shear behavior prediction; Feature importance; Direct shear test; ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT; STRENGTH CRITERION; MODEL; DEFORMATION; FRICTION; CLASSIFICATION; DEGRADATION; REGRESSION; SURFACES; MODULUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101517
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In this study, machine learning prediction models (MLPMs), including artificial neural network (ANN), support vector regression (SVR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forest (RF) algorithms, were developed to predict the peak shear stress values and shear stress-displacement curves of rock joints. The database used contained 693 records of peak shear stress and 162 original shear stress-displacement curves derived from direct shear tests. The results demonstrated that the MLPMs provided reliable predictions for shear stress, with the mean squared errors (MSEs) between their predicted and measured shear stress varying from 0.003 to 0.069 and the coefficients of determination (R2 values) varying from 0.964 to 0.998. The feature importance values indicate that the joint surface roughness coefficient (JRC) is the most important influential factor in determining the peak shear stress, followed by the joint wall compressive strength (JCS), basic friction angle (ub), and shear surface area (As). Similarly, for the shear stress-displacement curve, the JRC is the dominant factor, followed by As, ub, and JCS. Additional direct shear tests were conducted for model validation. The validation shows that the MLPM predictions demonstrate improved consistency with the experimental results in relation to both the peak (c) 2024 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Geotechnical Society.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   ISRM Suggested Method for Determining the Basic Friction Angle of Planar Rock Surfaces by Means of Tilt Tests [J].
Alejano, L. R. ;
Muralha, J. ;
Ulusay, R. ;
Li, C. C. ;
Perez-Rey, I. ;
Karakul, H. ;
Chryssanthakis, P. ;
Aydan, O. .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2018, 51 (12) :3853-3859
[2]   Modeling deformation modulus of a stratified sedimentary rock mass using neural network, fuzzy inference and genetic programming [J].
Alemdag, S. ;
Gurocak, Z. ;
Cevik, A. ;
Cabalar, A. F. ;
Gokceoglu, C. .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2016, 203 :70-82
[3]  
Altman N., 1992, INTRO KERNEL NEAREST
[4]  
Amadei B., 1998, GEOTECH GEOL ENG, V16, P79, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1008886106337
[5]   Constitutive model for rock fractures: Revisiting Barton's empirical model [J].
Asadollahi, Pooyan ;
Tonon, Fulvio .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2010, 113 (1-4) :11-32
[6]  
Aydan Ichikawa Y., 1990, ROCK JOINTS P INT S
[7]  
Bandis S., 1980, Experimental Studies of Scale Effects on Shear Strength, and Deformation of Rock Joints
[8]  
Barton, 1982, MODELLING ROCK JOINT
[9]   REVIEW OF A NEW SHEAR-STRENGTH CRITERION FOR ROCK JOINTS [J].
BARTON, N .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 1973, 7 (04) :287-332
[10]  
Barton N., 1977, Rock Mechanics, V10, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF01261801