Heat recovery from hot water drainage: CFD simulation, energy efficiency and exergoeconomic analysis of concentric tube heat exchangers

被引:2
作者
Ali, Samer [1 ]
Faraj, Jalal [2 ,3 ]
Khaled, Mahmoud [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Artois, Univ Lille, Inst Mines Telecom, Junia ULR 4515 LGCgE,Lab Genie Civil & geoenvironm, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Lebanese Int Univ LIU, Energy & Thermofluid Grp, Bekaa, Lebanon
[3] Int Univ Beirut BIU, Energy & Thermo Fluid Grp, Beirut, Lebanon
[4] Gulf Univ Sci & Technol, GUST Ctr Sustainable Dev, Kuwait, Kuwait
来源
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING | 2024年 / 98卷
关键词
Heat recovery from drain; CFD; Numerical simulations; Energy analysis; Exergoeconomic analysis; Payback period; NPV; Cost analysis; UNIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111034
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigates the performance and economic viability of a heat recovery concentric tube heat exchanger (HR-CTHE) integrated with water heating systems using either electricity or natural gas. The system recovers heat from hot water drainage to preheat cold water, thereby enhancing energy efficiency. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations are conducted, examining cold and hot water drain Reynolds numbers ranging from 1,000 to 20,000, hot water drain inlet temperatures from 303 K to 333 K, diameter ratios from 1.25 to 3, and inner diameters from 0.01 m to 0.05 m. Results indicate that at an inlet temperature of 333 K and a hot water Reynolds number of 20,000, the heat recovery rate reaches approximately 20,000 W, and the preheated cold water temperature can achieve 316 K. Exergetic efficiency is highest at 0.4392 for a diameter ratio of 1.25 and an inner diameter of 0.01 m. Economic evaluations using Net Present Value (NPV) and discounted payback period indicate that coupling HR-CTHE with electric heaters is more attractive, providing higher savings and quicker returns on investment compared to natural gas heaters. For instance, integrating HR-CTHE with electric water heaters yields a discounted payback period as short as 0.2 years. In contrast, for natural gas heaters, the payback period is around 2.2 years under similar conditions. The exergoeconomic analysis further demonstrates that natural gas heaters achieve cost-effectiveness only under high hot water Reynolds numbers and inlet temperatures, while electric heaters show significant benefits at moderate to high Reh. The study concludes with recommendations for optimizing HR-CTHE performance and cost-effectiveness, emphasizing higher hot water inlet temperatures, lower diameter ratios, and appropriate Reynolds numbers for both fluids.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] ANSYS Fluent Software, 2023, Computer software
  • [2] Aridi R., 2023, Int. J. Thermofluids, V20, DOI [10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100455, DOI 10.1016/J.IJFT.2023.100455]
  • [3] Thermoeconomic and environmental impacts of vortex generator-equipped multi-drain heat recovery systems under various renewable sources
    Aridi, Rima
    Ali, Samer
    Lemenand, Thierry
    Faraj, Jalal
    Khaled, Mahmoud
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2023, 20
  • [4] Digital twin technology for thermal comfort and energy efficiency in buildings: A state-of-the-art and future directions
    Arowoiya V.A.
    Moehler R.C.
    Fang Y.
    [J]. Energy and Built Environment, 2024, 5 (05): : 641 - 656
  • [5] Bergman T. L., 2017, FUNDAMENTALS HEAT MA, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2011.03.022
  • [6] Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications
    Celik, Ishmail B.
    Ghia, Urmila
    Roache, Patrick J.
    Freitas, Christopher J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2008, 130 (07): : 0780011 - 0780014
  • [7] Din I., 2017, Optimization of Energy Systems
  • [8] Dittus F.W., 1985, U CALIF BERKELEY PUB, V12, P3, DOI DOI 10.1016/0735-1933(85)90003-X
  • [9] A short review on the techniques of waste heat recovery from domestic applications
    El Hage, Hicham
    Ramadan, Mohamad
    Jaber, Hassan
    Khaled, Mahmoud
    Olabi, Abdul Ghani
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2020, 42 (24) : 3019 - 3034
  • [10] Elenga R. G., 2025, Energy and Built Environment, V6, P332, DOI [10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.11.008, DOI 10.1016/J.ENBENV.2023.11.008]