AI-assisted research collaboration with open data for fair and effective response to call for proposals

被引:0
作者
Valluru, Siva Likitha [1 ]
Widener, Michael [2 ]
Srivastava, Biplav [1 ]
Natarajan, Sriraam [3 ]
Gangopadhyay, Sugata [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Boston Coll, Chestnut Hill, MA USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Richardson, TX USA
[4] Indian Inst Technol, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
关键词
TEAM FORMATION; OPTIMIZATION; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1002/aaai.12203
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Building teams and promoting collaboration are two very common business activities. An example of these are seen in the TeamingForFunding problem, where research institutions and researchers are interested to identify collaborative opportunities when applying to funding agencies in response to latter's calls for proposals. We describe a novel deployed system to recommend teams using a variety of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods, such that (1) each team achieves the highest possible skill coverage that is demanded by the opportunity, and (2) the workload of distributing the opportunities is balanced among the candidate members. We address these questions by extracting skills latent in open data of proposal calls (demand) and researcher profiles (supply), normalizing them using taxonomies, and creating efficient algorithms that match demand to supply. We create teams to maximize goodness along a novel metric balancing short- and long-term objectives. We evaluate our system in two diverse settings in US and India of researchers and proposal calls, at two different time instants about 1 year apart (total 4 settings), to establish generality of our approach, and deploy it at a major US university. We validate the effectiveness of our algorithms (1) quantitatively, by evaluating the recommended teams using a goodness score and find that more informed methods lead to recommendations of smaller number of teams and higher goodness, and (2) qualitatively, by conducting a large-scale user study at a college-wide level, and demonstrate that users overall found the tool very useful and relevant.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 471
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Abdollahpouri H., 2019, FLORIDA ARTIFICIAL I
[2]  
ACM, 2012, ACM CLASSIFICATION S
[3]   Multi-objective optimization and decision making approaches to cricket team selection [J].
Ahmed, Faez ;
Deb, Kalyanmoy ;
Jindal, Abhilash .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (01) :402-414
[4]   An artificial intelligence tool for heterogeneous team formation in the classroom [J].
Alberola, Juan M. ;
del Val, Elena ;
Sanchez-Anguix, Victor ;
Palomares, Alberto ;
Teruel, Maria Dolores .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2016, 101 :1-14
[5]  
Amer-Yahia S., 2009, PROC VLDB ENDOW, V2, P754, DOI DOI 10.14778/1687627.1687713
[6]   A unifying and general account of fairness measurement in recommender systems [J].
Amigo, Enrique ;
Deldjoo, Yashar ;
Mizzaro, Stefano ;
Bellogin, Alejandro .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 60 (01)
[7]  
Anagnostopoulos A., 2012, P 21 INT C WORLD WID, P839, DOI DOI 10.1145/2187836.2187950
[8]   Fractional Hedonic Games [J].
Aziz, Haris ;
Brandl, Florian ;
Brandt, Felix ;
Harrenstein, Paul ;
Olsen, Martin ;
Peters, Dominik .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ECONOMICS AND COMPUTATION, 2019, 7 (02)
[9]  
Boratto Ludovico, 2010, PRSAT@RecSys, P27
[10]  
Bulmer J. K., 2021, TEAM FORMATION USING