What helps Agile remote teams to be successful in developing software? Empirical evidence

被引：3
作者：
Adzgauskaite, Marta [1 ]
Tam, Carlos [1 ]
Martins, Ricardo [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, NOVA Informat Management Sch NOVA IMS, Campus Campolide, P-1070312 Lisbon, Portugal
来源：
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY | 2025年 / 177卷
关键词：
Agile software development project; management; Critical success factors; Remote work; TOE framework; PROJECTS; PERFORMANCE; ADOPTION; DETERMINANTS; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; VARIABLES; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I：
10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107593
中图分类号：
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
Software development firms have specific goals but today's dynamic business environment, especially regarding the use of remote teams, presents great challenges due to uncertainties and multiple risks. This study investigates the facilitators of the success of Agile software development projects delivered by remote teams. We employ a conceptual research model founded on the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework. The study contributes to the literature by exploring how remote teams affect the success of Agile software development projects. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis of the data collected from 198 IT professionals revealed that perceived pressure from government, job performance, and team satisfaction are significant in explaining these projects' success.
引用
收藏
页数：13
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Determinant factors in applying electronic medical records in health-care [J].
Abdekhoda, Mohammadinwa ;
Dehnad, Afsaneh ;
Zarei, Javad .
EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (01) :24-33
[2]   A contingency fit model of critical success factors for software development projects A comparison of agile and traditional plan-based methodologies [J].
Ahimbisibwe, Arthur ;
Cavana, Robert Y. ;
Daellenbach, Urs .
JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 28 (01) :7-33
[3]  
Al-Habaibeh Amin, 2021, Glob Transit, V3, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.glt.2021.11.001
[4]   Agile software development: Methodologies and trends [J].
Al-Saqqa S. ;
Sawalha S. ;
Abdelnabi H. .
International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2020, 14 (11) :246-270
[5]   User Involvement in Software Development Processes [J].
Alvertis, Iosif ;
Koussouris, Sotiris ;
Papaspyros, Dimitris ;
Arvanitakis, Evangelos ;
Mouzakitis, Spiros ;
Franken, Sebastian ;
Kolvenbach, Sabine ;
Prinz, Wolgang .
2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD FORWARD: FROM DISTRIBUTED TO COMPLETE COMPUTING, 2016, 97 :73-83
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, MANAGEMENT INNOVATIO
[7]  
Atkinson R., 1999, Int. J. Proj. Manag., V17, P337, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6, 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6]
[8]  
AXELOS, 2021, PRINCE2 Agile
[9]   Examining and Comparing the Critical Success Factors Between Business Process Management and Business Process Automation [J].
Aysolmaz, Banu ;
Joshi, Anant ;
Stubhan, Maximilian .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 31 (01)
[10]  
Baker J., 2012, The technology-organization-environment framework Information systems theory, P231, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-212
12345678910