Study on co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of hydrothermal carbonized biomass and coal

被引：0
作者：
He Q. [1 ]
Cheng C. [1 ]
Gong Y. [1 ]
Ding L. [1 ]
Yu G.-S. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Institute of Clean Coal Technology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai
[2] State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Coal Utilization and Green Chemical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan
来源：
Ranliao Huaxue Xuebao/Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology | 2022年 / 50卷 / 06期
关键词：
co-gasification; co-pyrolysis; H[!sub]2[!/sub] generation; kinetics; synergistic effect;
D O I：
10.19906/j.cnki.JFCT.2022002
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The co-thermochemical conversion of coal and biomass can contribute to the low carbonization of current fossil energy system. In this work, the bituminous and lignocellulosic biomass were selected to study the co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of coal and biomass, with the consideration of different hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) temperature and biomass blending ratio. The synergistic effect of co-pyrolysis and co-gasification was analyzed by using the thermogravimetric analyzer, and the H2 release property was investigated by the online mass spectrometer. The model-fitting method was adopted to analyze the overall kinetics during pyrolysis and gasification stage, respectively. The results showed that the synergistic effect of coal and biomass in co-gasification stage was much stronger than that in co-pyrolysis stage. The gasification synergy was enhanced with the biomass blending ratio, while the HTC pretreatment could weaken the synergy. The H2 production was inhibited during co-pyrolysis. The first-order reaction model could well describe the co-gasification process, while the n-order reaction model was suitable for the co-pyrolysis process. For the blends of raw or the slight HTC biomass and coal, the overall pyrolysis activation energy (Ea) was greater than that calculated by the weighted average, whereas the overall gasification Ea showed the opposite trend. For the blends of the severe HTC biomass and coal, the Ea of co-pyrolysis and co-gasification were both close to the weighted average value. © 2022 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：664 / 673
页数：9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
GOUWS S M, CARRIER M, BUNT J R, NEOMAGUS H W J P., Co-pyrolysis of coal and raw/torrefied biomass: A review on chemistry, kinetics and implementation[J], Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev, 135, (2021)
[2]  
HE Q, GUO Q, UMEKI K, DING L, WANG F, YU G., Soot formation during biomass gasification: A critical review[J], Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev, 139, (2021)
[3]  
PATEL M, ZHANG X, KUMAR A., Techno-economic and life cycle assessment on lignocellulosic biomass thermochemical conversion technologies: A review[J], Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev, 53, pp. 1486-1499, (2016)
[4]  
HE Q, DING L, RAHEEM A, GUO Q, GONG Y, YU G., Kinetics comparison and insight into structure-performance correlation for leached biochar gasification[J], Chem Eng J, 417, (2021)
[5]  
ARRIOLA E, CHEN W-H, CHIH Y-K, DE LUNA M D, SHOW P L., Impact of post-torrefaction process on biochar formation from wood pellets and self-heating phenomena for production safety[J], Energy, 207, (2020)
[6]  
HE Q, DING L, GONG Y, LI W, WEI J, YU G., Effect of torrefaction on pinewood pyrolysis kinetics and thermal behavior using thermogravimetric analysis[J], Bioresour Technol, 280, (2019)
[7]  
ZHANG S, CHEN T, XIONG Y, DONG Q., Effects of wet torrefaction on the physicochemical properties and pyrolysis product properties of rice husk[J], Energy Convers Manage, 141, (2017)
[8]  
ZHUANG X, SONG Y, ZHAN H, YIN X, WU C., Gasification performance of biowaste-derived hydrochar: The properties of products and the conversion processes[J], Fuel, 260, (2020)
[9]  
OLSZEWSKI M P, NICOLAE S A, ARAUZO P J, TITIRICI M-M, KRUSE A., Wet and dry? Influence of hydrothermal carbonization on the pyrolysis of spent grains[J], J Clean Prod, 260, (2020)
[10]  
HE Y, CHANG C, LI P, HAN X, LI H, FANG S, CHEN J, MA X., Thermal decomposition and kinetics of coal and fermented cornstalk using thermogravimetric analysis[J], Bioresour Technol, 259, pp. 294-303, (2018)
1234