Effects of spot size errors in DynamicARC pencil beam scanning proton therapy planning

被引:0
作者
Rana, Suresh [1 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Boca Raton Reg Hosp, Lynn Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baptist Hlth South Florida, Boca Raton, FL 33486 USA
[2] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys CMRP, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
关键词
proton arc; DynamicARC; spot size; proton therapy; prostate cancer; head and neck cancer; lung cancer;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad8feb
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Spot size stability is crucial in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy, and variations in spot size can disrupt dose distributions. Recently, a novel proton beam delivery method known as DynamicARC PBS scanning has been introduced. The current study investigates the dosimetric impact of spot size errors in DynamicARC proton therapy for head and neck (HNC), prostate, and lung cancers. Approach. Robustly optimized DynamicARC proton therapy plans were created for HNC (n = 4), prostate (n = 4), and lung (n = 4) cancer patients. Spot size errors of +/- 10%, +/- 15%, and +/- 20% were introduced, and their effects on target coverage ( D 95% and D 99% ), homogeneity index (HI), and organ-at-risk doses were analyzed across different cancer sites. Main Results. HNC and lung cancer plans showed greater vulnerability to spot size errors, with reductions in target coverage of up to 4.8% under - 20% spot size errors. Dose homogeneity was also more affected in these cases, with HI degrading by 0.12 in lung cancer. Prostate cancer demonstrated greater resilience to spot size variations, even under errors of +/- 20%. For spot size errors +/- 10%, the oral cavity, parotid glands, and constrictor muscles experienced D mean deviations within +/- 1.2%, while deviations were limited to +/- 0.5% for D 10% of the bladder and rectum and +/- 0.3% for V 20 Gy(RBE) of the lungs. The robustness analysis indicated that lung cancer plans were most susceptible to robustness reductions caused by spot size errors, while HNC plans demonstrated moderate sensitivity. Conversely, prostate cancer plans demonstrated high robustness, experiencing only minimal reductions in target coverage. Significance. While the +/- 10% spot size tolerance is appropriate in majority of the cases, lung cancer plans may require more stringent criteria. As DynamicARC becomes clinically available, measuring spot size errors in practice will be essential to validate these findings and refine tolerance thresholds for clinical use.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] AAPM task group 224: Comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance
    Arjomandy, Bijan
    Taylor, Paige
    Ainsley, Christopher
    Safai, Sairos
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Pankuch, Mark
    Farr, Jonathan B.
    Park, Sung Yong
    Klein, Eric
    Flanz, Jacob
    Yorke, Ellen D.
    Followill, David
    Kase, Yuki
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (08) : E678 - E705
  • [2] Dosimetric consequences of pencil beam width variations in scanned beam particle therapy
    Chanrion, M. A.
    Ammazzalorso, F.
    Wittig, A.
    Engenhart-Cabillic, R.
    Jelen, U.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (12) : 3979 - 3993
  • [3] Four-dimensional Plan Optimization for the Treatment of Lung Tumors Using Pencil-beam Scanning Proton Radiotherapy
    Cummings, David
    Tang, Shikui
    Ichter, William
    Wang, Peng
    Sturgeon, Jared D.
    Lee, Andrew K.
    Chang, Chang
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [4] Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients
    de Jong, Bas A.
    Battinelli, Cecilia
    Free, Jeffrey
    Wagenaar, Dirk
    Engwall, Erik
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Both, Stefan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (03) : 1305 - 1317
  • [5] Fast robust optimization of proton PBS arc therapy plans using early energy layer selection and spot assignment
    Engwall, Erik
    Battinelli, Cecilia
    Wase, Viktor
    Marthin, Otte
    Glimelius, Lars
    Bokrantz, Rasmus
    Andersson, Bjorn
    Fredriksson, Albin
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (06)
  • [6] 4D robust optimization including uncertainties in time structures can reduce the interplay effect in proton pencil beam scanning radiation therapy
    Engwall, Erik
    Fredriksson, Albin
    Glimelius, Lars
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (09) : 4020 - 4029
  • [7] Impact of spot size variations on dose in scanned proton beam therapy
    Kraan, A. C.
    Depauw, N.
    Clasie, B.
    Madden, T.
    Kooy, H. M.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 57 : 58 - 64
  • [8] The first prototype of spot-scanning proton arc treatment delivery
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Liu, Gang
    Janssens, Guillaume
    De Wilde, Olivier
    Bossier, Vincent
    Lerot, Xavier
    Pouppez, Antoine
    Yan, Di
    Stevens, Craig
    Kabolizadeh, Peyman
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 137 : 130 - 136
  • [9] Impacts of gantry angle dependent scanning beam properties on proton PBS treatment
    Lin, Yuting
    Clasie, Benjamin
    Lu, Hsiao-Ming
    Flanz, Jacob
    Shen, Tim
    Jee, Kyung-Wook
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (02) : 344 - 357
  • [10] The influence of lateral beam profile modifications in scanned proton and carbon ion therapy: a Monte Carlo study
    Parodi, K.
    Mairani, A.
    Brons, S.
    Naumann, J.
    Kraemer, M.
    Sommerer, F.
    Haberer, T.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (17) : 5169 - 5187