Impact of hybrid and non-hybrid Fiber Reinforced Polymers on mechanical performance of concrete

被引:3
作者
Cakir, Ferit [1 ]
Aydin, Muhammet Raci [2 ]
Acar, Volkan [3 ]
Yildirim, Pinar [4 ]
机构
[1] Gebze Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kocaeli, Turkiye
[2] Igdir Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Igdir, Turkiye
[3] Ataturk Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Erzurum, Turkiye
[4] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRPs); Non-hybrid composites (NHC); Intraply hybrid composites (IRC); Concrete reinforcement; Mechanical properties; CYLINDERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138806
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) are widely recognized in construction for their excellent mechanical properties, low weight, and resistance to corrosion. Recent advancements have introduced various types of FRPs, including intraply hybrid composites (IRCs). This study explores the influence of non-hybrid composites (NHC) and IRCs on concrete's structural performance. The research involved three types of NHC (Carbon (C), Glass (G), and Aramid (A)) and three types of IRCs (Aramid-Carbon (AC), Glass-Aramid (GA), and Carbon-Glass (CG)) used to reinforce concrete specimens of various shapes and sizes. Experimental testing was conducted on 21 cylindrical specimens (100 x 200 mm), 12 cylindrical specimens (150 x 300 mm), 21 prismatic specimens (50 x 50 x 200 mm), 21 cubic specimens (150 x 150 x 150 mm), and 9 small cubic specimens (50 x 50 x 50 mm). The tests included assessments of flexural strength, compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, Poisson's ratio, tangent modulus, and secant modulus. The findings indicate notable enhancements in the mechanical properties of concrete reinforced with both NHC and IRCs, offering valuable insights into their effectiveness in improving concrete performance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Behavior of concrete prisms confined with FRP composites under axial cyclic compression [J].
Abbasnia, R. ;
Ziaadiny, H. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (03) :648-655
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ASTM D792-13, DOI [DOI 10.1520/D0792-13, 10.1520/D0792-13]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, DOI [10.1520/C0496_C0496M-17, DOI 10.1520/C0496_C0496M-17]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ASTM C469/C469M-14 Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson's Ratio of Concrete in Compression, DOI [10.1520/C0469, DOI 10.1520/C0469]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ASTM C39/C39M-18, DOI DOI 10.1520/C0039C0039M-18
[7]  
ASTM, ASTM C78/C78M-18
[8]   Comparative dynamic analysis of carbon, aramid and glass fiber reinforced interply and intraply hybrid composites [J].
Aydin, Muhammet Raci ;
Acar, Volkan ;
Cakir, Ferit ;
Gundogdu, Omer ;
Akbulut, Hamit .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2022, 291
[9]   Stiffness-based design-oriented compressive stress-strain model for large-rupture-strain (LRS) FRP-confined concrete [J].
Bai, Yu-Lei ;
Dai, Jian-Guo ;
Mohammadi, Mohsen ;
Lin, Guan ;
Mei, Shi-Jie .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2019, 223
[10]   An experimental study on RC beams shear-strengthened with Intraply Hybrid U-Jackets Composites monitored by digital image correlation (DIC) [J].
Cakir, Ferit ;
Aydin, M. Raci ;
Acar, Volkan ;
Aksar, Bora ;
Akkaya, Hasan Cem .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2023, 232