A step towards energy efficiency in G7 countries: analyzing the role of economic complexity and shadow economy on energy intensity

被引:0
作者
Chu, Lan Khanh [1 ,2 ]
Dung, Hoang Phuong [3 ]
Thanh, To Trung [4 ]
机构
[1] Vietnam Banking Acad, Banking Res Inst, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Banking Strategy Inst, State Bank Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Natl Econ Univ, Fac Mkt, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Natl Econ Univ, Res Management Dept, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Economic complexity; Energy efficiency; G7; countries; Interaction; Shadow economy; CO2; EMISSIONS; PANEL-DATA; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; INFORMAL SECTOR; DETERMINANTS; POLLUTION; CHINA; TESTS; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1007/s12053-024-10278-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Due to the environmental impacts caused by increasing energy consumption, energy efficiency has become an important policy objective for various countries and governments. While many studies have explored the determinants of energy intensity, the question of how economic complexity and the shadow economy affect energy efficiency has received inadequate attention. This paper connects these issues by studying the direct and complementary effects of economic complexity and the shadow economy on energy efficiency in G7 countries. The empirical findings indicate that both economic sophistication and the shadow economy exert adverse impacts on energy intensity. However, each factor has a harmonizing effect on the other's influence on energy intensity. While the expansion of the shadow economy reduces the harmful effect of economic complexity on energy intensity, economic sophistication diminishes the damaging impact of the shadow economy. Therefore, the effect of either economic complexity or the shadow economy on energy intensity depends on their interactions and their influence on total energy use. These findings provide governments with policy implications for handling the interrelations between these economic, social, and energy issues.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]   Economic complexity and jobs: an empirical analysis [J].
Adam, Antonis ;
Garas, Antonios ;
Katsaiti, Marina-Selini ;
Lapatinas, Athanasios .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 32 (01) :25-52
[2]   Does economic complexity drive energy efficiency and renewable energy transition? [J].
Adekoya, Oluwasegun B. ;
Kenku, Oluwademilade T. ;
Oliyide, Johnson A. ;
Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh ;
Ogunjemilua, Oluwafemi D. .
ENERGY, 2023, 278
[3]   Effects of changing trade structure and technical characteristics of the manufacturing sector on energy intensity in Ghana [J].
Adom, Philip K. ;
Kwakwa, Paul Adjei .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 35 :475-483
[4]   Determinants of energy intensity in South Africa: Testing for structural effects in parameters [J].
Adom, Philip Kofi .
ENERGY, 2015, 89 :334-346
[5]   The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation [J].
Ahmad, Mahmood ;
Jiang, Ping ;
Majeed, Abdul ;
Umar, Muhammad ;
Khan, Zeeshan ;
Muhammad, Sulaman .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69 (69)
[6]   Pollution haven hypothesis and the role of dirty industries in Turkey's exports [J].
Akbostanci, Elif ;
Tunc, G. Ipek ;
Turut-Asik, Serap .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2007, 12 :297-322
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, World development indicators
[8]   Foreign direct investment and export spillovers: Evidence from Vietnam [J].
Anwar, Sajid ;
Lan Phi Nguyen .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2011, 20 (02) :177-193
[9]   Energy efficiency of selected OECD countries: A slacks based model with undesirable outputs [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Aye, Goodness C. ;
Barros, Carlos Pestana ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Wanke, Peter .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 51 :45-53
[10]  
Autor D, 2018, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1