A scoping review of strengths-based drinking water policies in Indigenous communities in Canada, the United States, New Zealand, and Australia

被引:0
作者
Lyeo, Joonsoo S. [1 ]
Samim, Yagana [2 ]
Decter, Kate [3 ]
Agarwal, Nehul [4 ]
Liberda, Eric N. [5 ]
Haines, Sarah R. [4 ]
Spence, Nicholas D. [2 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Sociol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Anthropol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Fac Appl Sci & Engn, Dept Civil & Mineral Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Sch Occupat & Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth & Soc, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys & Environm Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS | 2025年 / 33卷
关键词
drinking water; Indigenous peoples; scoping review; strengths-based;
D O I
10.1139/er-2024-0081
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Indigenous Peoples of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States have faced a shared history of disenfranchisement under settler-colonial paradigms. One consequence of this marginalization has been the widespread deprivation of secure access to safe drinking water in Indigenous communities. To date, much of the literature on Indigenous drinking water access has taken a deficit-based approach, focusing on the factors that are "lacking" from Indigenous communities. Deficit-based approaches have been criticized for perpetuating cycles of negative experiences, fostering dependency within the target community, and leading to interventions that are unsustainable and limited in scope. In contrast, this scoping review comprised a strengths-based investigation of successful Indigenous drinking water policy in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Through this review of the gray literature published from 2000 to 2024, we identified methods for measuring the success of Indigenous drinking water policies; common features of Indigenous drinking water policies said to be successful; and external factors which have been found to contribute to the success of Indigenous drinking water policies. The subsequent thematic analysis revealed a need to leverage the assets within Indigenous communities, drawing upon the strengths inherent to traditional knowledge systems and cultural practices, by involving Indigenous Peoples as key stakeholders in the development of drinking water policy. There is an opportunity for policymakers to engage in an iterative process that considers the larger problems we have identified in this review, as well as the community-specific concerns of the Indigenous groups being served.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Framework: Multiple ben-efits of ownership and management of water by Traditional Owners, (2022)
[2]  
Angeles D., Eastman T., Gavette J., Gomes J., Johnson A.L., Smith W., Et al., Tribal water quality accomplishments, (2006)
[3]  
Arksey H., O'Malley L., Scoping studies: towards a methodolog-ical framework, Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol, 8, 1, pp. 19-32, (2005)
[4]  
Beal C.D., Jackson M., Stewart R.A., Fielding K., Miller A., Tan P.L., Exploring community-based water management options for remote Australia, Remote and Isolated Communities Essential Services Project, (2019)
[5]  
Becker B., Castle A., Tanana H., Olaya A., Garcia J., Colwyn C., Universal access to clean water for tribes: recommendations for operational, administrative, policy, and regulatory reform, (2021)
[6]  
Berry S., Madsen J., Huckins S., Wammock G., Christian-Smith J., Na-jera A., Sokolove K., Policy innovations to secure drinking water for all, (2020)
[7]  
Boelens R., Chiba M., Nakashima D., Retana V., Water and indigenous peoples, 2, (2006)
[8]  
Exploration of Māori participation in freshwater management, (2009)
[9]  
Boyd G., What does the Housing, Infrastructure, Water and Emergency services sector do for First Nations? Assembly of First Nations, (2020)
[10]  
Brekke A., Nordstrom T., Billey T., Nelson L., “Water is life”: water access in the Navajo Nation, (2022)